Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorLiñeira, Robertde
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-14T11:06:07Z
dc.date.available2021-12-14T11:06:07Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/76277
dc.description.abstractNational identifications, cues from political actors, and cost-benefit calculations have been pointed as the main determinants of secession preferences. However, a recent surge in independence support in Scotland suggests that abrupt political changes may also affect these preferences: Brexit and the differentiated management of the Covid-19 pandemic by the UK and the Scottish governments are named as causes of the first independence sustained majority registered by polling in Scotland. In this article, I discuss how voting shocks may affect the levels of support for independence, revise the evidence that sustains these claims, and analyse how they have changed the profile of the pro-independence voter. The effect of these questions has substantial implications for a possible second independence referendum in Scotland, as well as for the broader debate on the sources of secession support.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.ddcStaatsformen und Regierungssystemede
dc.subject.ddcSystems of governments & statesen
dc.subject.otherBrexit; Covid-19; pandemic; Scotland; independence referendumsde
dc.titleValence Secession? Voting Shocks and Independence Support in Scotlandde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4571de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume9de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozStaat, staatliche Organisationsformende
dc.subject.classozPolitical System, Constitution, Governmenten
dc.subject.thesozGroßbritanniende
dc.subject.thesozGreat Britainen
dc.subject.thesozSezessionde
dc.subject.thesozsecessionen
dc.subject.thesozöffentliche Meinungde
dc.subject.thesozpublic opinionen
dc.subject.thesozVolksentscheidde
dc.subject.thesozreferendumen
dc.subject.thesoznationale Identitätde
dc.subject.thesoznational identityen
dc.subject.thesozParteide
dc.subject.thesozpartyen
dc.subject.thesozIdentifikationde
dc.subject.thesozidentificationen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10042102
internal.identifier.thesoz10052987
internal.identifier.thesoz10052047
internal.identifier.thesoz10061649
internal.identifier.thesoz10046995
internal.identifier.thesoz10036000
internal.identifier.thesoz10042019
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo399-411de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.classoz10503
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
internal.identifier.ddc321
dc.source.issuetopicSecessionism in Liberal Democracies: What Do We Really Know About the Explanations of Secessionism?de
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4571de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4571
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record