Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorEzdi, Seharde
dc.contributor.authorKilpi-Jakonen, Elinade
dc.contributor.authorPöyliö, Hetade
dc.contributor.authorErola, Janide
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-19T09:23:28Z
dc.date.available2024-09-19T09:23:28Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn2699-2337de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/96691
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study assesses whether and how changes in family policies are associated with first and second births in Finland, Germany and the United Kingdom, and whether these associations differ by women’s education. Background: Family policies are expected to impact the direct and indirect costs of childbearing by providing resources that influence the monetary and non-monetary costs of having children. The countries analysed here have undergone substantial changes in family policy throughout the two decades analysed, but each country has changed different aspects of their policies, and they have done so in different policy environments. Method: We analysed women aged 18–44 and their transitions to first and second births using register data from Finland (N = 57,518 / 21,685) and panel data from Germany (G-SOEP, N=37,716 / 16,756) and the UK (BHPS and Understanding Society, N = 13,213 / 9,992) complemented with annual family policy information. The data were analysed using logistic regression models and interactions, and the results are presented as average marginal effects. Results: The results suggest that the association between changes in family policies and transitions to first and second child birth varied by birth parity, women's education level, and between countries. For example in Finland, increases in paternity leave length were associated with greater propensities to transition to first birth for highly educated women, whereas increases in child allowances had a similar association for lower educated women. In Germany, reductions in maternity leave length were associated with increased transitions to first birth for higher educated women. In the UK, increases in maternity leave length were associated with greater transitions to first births among all women. Conclusion: The results highlight that to the extent that family policies influence fertility, they do so depending on both the country context and often differentially within countries based on women's education level and birth parity.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherlongitudinal analysis; Finnish Register Data (building from a 10% sample of the population in 1987) (Statistics Finland, German Socio-Economic Panel (2017), British Household Panel Survey (waves 5-18) and Understanding Society (waves 1-7) (2018)de
dc.titleChildbearing under different family policy schemesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/jfr/index.php/jfr/article/view/987/798de
dc.identifier.url10.20377/jfr-987-798de
dc.identifier.urlhttps://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/jfr/index.php/jfr/article/view/987/799de
dc.identifier.url10.20377/jfr-987-799de
dc.identifier.urlhttps://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/jfr/index.php/jfr/article/view/987/804de
dc.identifier.url10.20377/jfr-987-804de
dc.source.journalJFR - Journal of Family Research
dc.source.volume36de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.subject.classozFamilienpolitik, Jugendpolitik, Altenpolitikde
dc.subject.classozFamily Policy, Youth Policy, Policy on the Elderlyen
dc.subject.classozBevölkerungde
dc.subject.classozPopulation Studies, Sociology of Populationen
dc.subject.thesozFruchtbarkeitde
dc.subject.thesozfertilityen
dc.subject.thesozGeburtenhäufigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozfertility rateen
dc.subject.thesozFamilienpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozfamily policyen
dc.subject.thesozBildungsniveaude
dc.subject.thesozlevel of educationen
dc.subject.thesozMutterschaftde
dc.subject.thesozmotherhooden
dc.subject.thesozFinnlandde
dc.subject.thesozFinlanden
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozGroßbritanniende
dc.subject.thesozGreat Britainen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10044407
internal.identifier.thesoz10044676
internal.identifier.thesoz10043309
internal.identifier.thesoz10039352
internal.identifier.thesoz10052813
internal.identifier.thesoz10043717
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10042102
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo305-326de
internal.identifier.classoz11007
internal.identifier.classoz10303
internal.identifier.journal1690
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-987de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://ubp.uni-bamberg.de/jfr/index.php/jfr/oai@@oai:ubp.uni-bamberg.de/jfr:article/987
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record