Volltext herunterladen
(203.2 KB)
Zitationshinweis
Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-95901-8
Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung
Steady steps versus sudden shifts: Cooperation in (a)symmetric linear and step-level social dilemmas
[Zeitschriftenartikel]
Abstract Are groups of people better able to minimize a collective loss if there is a collective target that must be reached or if every small contribution helps? In this paper we investigate whether cooperation in social dilemmas can be increased by structuring the problem as a step-level social dilemma rat... mehr
Are groups of people better able to minimize a collective loss if there is a collective target that must be reached or if every small contribution helps? In this paper we investigate whether cooperation in social dilemmas can be increased by structuring the problem as a step-level social dilemma rather than a linear social dilemma and whether cooperation can be increased by manipulating endowment asymmetry between individuals. In two laboratory experiments using 'Public Bad' games, we found that that individuals defect less and are better able to minimize collective and personal costs in a step-level social dilemma than in a linear social dilemma. We found that the level of cooperation is not affected by an ambiguous threshold: even when participants cannot be sure about the optimal cooperation level, cooperation remains high in the step-level social dilemmas. We find mixed results for the effect of asymmetry on cooperation. These results imply that presenting social dilemmas as step-level games and reducing asymmetry can help solve environmental dilemmas in the long term.... weniger
Thesaurusschlagwörter
Kooperation; soziales Dilemma; Umweltverhalten; Gruppendynamik
Klassifikation
Sozialpsychologie
Freie Schlagwörter
behavioral economics
Sprache Dokument
Englisch
Publikationsjahr
2021
Seitenangabe
S. 142-164
Zeitschriftentitel
Judgment and Decision Making, 16 (2021) 1
Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/232298
ISSN
1930-2975
Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)