Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKurbonova, Zulfiya M.de
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-08T09:29:53Z
dc.date.available2024-08-08T09:29:53Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2949-1568de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/95808
dc.description.abstractThe author of the article shows how difficult and specific was the path of independence of Central Asian states. After the collapse of the USSR, the independent states of the region, which had never solved domestic political issues on their own, faced many different problems. History has shown who gained independence and by what means. From both theoretical and practical points of view, all the new five states were not ready to become independent. The most bitter and bloody path was taken by Tajikistan, which was dragged into civil war for five years. Each state in the Central Asian region, which has similar traditions and culture to its neighbors, followed its own unique path of development. At the same time, all states of the Central Asian region have faced identical internal political problems: the threat of Islamic radicalism, socio-economic and intraconfessional problems, and problems of extremism, terrorism and separatism. The problem of Islamic radicalism has become particularly acute in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. Along with internal political and internal economic problems, the newly independent states have also faced foreign policy problems, namely border settlement and water and energy regulation. At present, the region is emphasizing the establishment of close cooperation between the newly independent states.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherCentral Asian region; issues of self-preservation; security issuesde
dc.titleThe specificity of acquisition of state independence in the Central Asian Republicsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSiberia Humanitarian
dc.publisher.countryRUSde
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Scienceen
dc.subject.thesozZentralasiende
dc.subject.thesozCentral Asiaen
dc.subject.thesozUdSSR-Nachfolgestaatde
dc.subject.thesozUSSR successor stateen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Unabhängigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical independenceen
dc.subject.thesozNationde
dc.subject.thesoznationen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical developmenten
dc.subject.thesozInnenpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozdomestic policyen
dc.subject.thesozAußenpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozforeign policyen
dc.subject.thesozKonfliktde
dc.subject.thesozconflicten
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-95808-2
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10062877
internal.identifier.thesoz10037611
internal.identifier.thesoz10034369
internal.identifier.thesoz10050463
internal.identifier.thesoz10040704
internal.identifier.thesoz10047493
internal.identifier.thesoz10034694
internal.identifier.thesoz10036275
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo104-115de
internal.identifier.classoz10500
internal.identifier.journal3121
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.32324/2949-1568-2023-3-104-115de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort10500de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record