Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorPolterovich, Victorde
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-06T13:29:04Z
dc.date.available2024-08-06T13:29:04Z
dc.date.issued2017de
dc.identifier.issn2618-7213de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/95726
dc.description.abstractThis article proposes that two types of collaboration can be distinguished: a positive collaboration (not directed against third parties) and negative collaboration. I consider the hypothesis that in the process of social development, the transaction costs ratio of the three main types of coordination - competition, power, and collaboration - is changing in favor of the latter. The article examines the mechanisms that are responsible for the implementation of this tendency and attempts to explain its nonmonotonicity. It is shown that the strengthening role of positive collaboration is largely explained by cultural changes, including the enhancement of tolerance culture, spread of cosmopolitanism and altruism, and increase in the planning horizon as well as trust radius. I demonstrate the importance of the institutions that support positive collaboration in the process of catching-up development; it is shown that shock reforms could lead to the formation of negative collaboration mechanisms. A program of interdisciplinary research is outlined for the further development of these ideas.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.otherpositive and negative collaboration; golden rule of morality; transaction costs; radius of trust; catching-up developmentde
dc.titlePositive collaboration: Factors and mechanisms of evolutionde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.journalRussian Journal of Economics
dc.source.volume3de
dc.publisher.countryRUSde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozSonstiges zu Wirtschaftswissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozOther Fields of Economic Sciencesen
dc.subject.thesozKoordinationde
dc.subject.thesozcoordinationen
dc.subject.thesozToleranzde
dc.subject.thesoztoleranceen
dc.subject.thesozAltruismusde
dc.subject.thesozaltruismen
dc.subject.thesozKosmopolitismusde
dc.subject.thesozcosmopolitanismen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10043942
internal.identifier.thesoz10047989
internal.identifier.thesoz10035383
internal.identifier.thesoz10068147
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo24-41de
internal.identifier.classoz10999
internal.identifier.journal1465
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc330
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2017.02.002de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
dc.subject.classhort10900de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record