Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBurton, Paulde
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sungheede
dc.contributor.authorRaghunathan, Trivellorede
dc.contributor.authorWest, Brady T.de
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-05T13:05:06Z
dc.date.available2024-08-05T13:05:06Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn2190-4936de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/95640
dc.description.abstractMany surveys target population subgroups that may not be readily identified in sampling frames. In the case study that motivated this study, the target population was households with children between the ages of 3 and 10 from two areas surrounding Cleveland, Ohio and Dallas, Texas. A standard approach is to sample households from these two areas and then screen for the presence of age-eligible children. Based on the estimated number of age-eligible households in these two areas, this approach would have required completing screening interviews with 5.4 to 5.7 households to find one eligible household. We developed a model-assisted sample design strategy to improve screening efficiency by attaching a measure of eligibility propensity to each household in the population. For this, we used a modeling and imputation strategy that combined information from several data sources: (1) the population of addresses for these two areas with demographic covariates from a commercial vendor, (2) external population data (from the American Community Survey and Census Planning Data) for these two areas, and (3) screening data from a large nationally representative survey. We first tested this sampling strategy in a pilot study and then implemented it in the main study. This strategy required 4.2 to 4.3 completed screeners to identify one eligible household. The proposed approach therefore improved the sampling efficiency by about 25% relative to the standard approach.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otheraddress-based sampling; imputation; rare populations; commercial data; census data; address framede
dc.titleCombining Information from Multiple Data Sources to Improve Sampling Efficiencyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalMethods, data, analyses : a journal for quantitative methods and survey methodology (mda)
dc.source.volume18de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozStichprobede
dc.subject.thesozsampleen
dc.subject.thesozEffizienzde
dc.subject.thesozefficiencyen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10037472
internal.identifier.thesoz10041426
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo143-164de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal614
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2024.03de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record