Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorShishova, Zhanna A.de
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-01T10:45:26Z
dc.date.available2024-08-01T10:45:26Z
dc.date.issued2020de
dc.identifier.issn2070-8378de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/95525
dc.description.abstractThe article reveals the main ethical problem of balancing freedom and security, which has become particularly acute in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The author highlights some other significant issues facing both individual states and the entire world community: the problem of choosing "who to save first", "save the economy or the people", as well as several moral and ethical problems related to individual responsibility of each person for the life and safety of fellow citizens. The article provides an overview of the main scientific theories ("Freedom is good, but security is better" by T. Hobbes, correlation of freedom and security by Ch. Montesquieu, the categorical imperative in ethics of I. Kant, the utilitarianism of I. Bentham and J. S. Mill, and the "trolley problem" by P. R. Foot) concerning the ethical problems faced by humanity in the "epoch of coronavirus". Special attention is paid to the views of modern foreign philosophers and sociologists (P. Singer, J. Everett) on global society's comprehension of the "a new reality" that has emerged as a result of the global economic shutdown and the unprecedented introduction of mass isolation and quarantine measures. The author analyzes from the point of view of ethics the actions taken by governments in different countries to ensure the safety of citizens and the guaranteeing of the basic right to live at the peak of a pandemic. The article notes the ambiguous nature of these measures, which can have far-reaching consequences for society and humanity.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophiede
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophyen
dc.subject.otherethical problem; COVID-19; trolley problemde
dc.titleCurrent ethical problems of modern society in the context of the fight against the Coronavirus epidemicde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.journalPublic Administration
dc.source.volume22de
dc.publisher.countryRUSde
dc.source.issue6de
dc.subject.classozPhilosophie, Theologiede
dc.subject.classozPhilosophy, Ethics, Religionen
dc.subject.thesozGesundheitspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozhealth policyen
dc.subject.thesozEthikde
dc.subject.thesozethicsen
dc.subject.thesozFreiheitde
dc.subject.thesozfreedomen
dc.subject.thesozSicherheitde
dc.subject.thesozsecurityen
dc.subject.thesozUtilitarismusde
dc.subject.thesozutilitarismen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-95525-2
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10045550
internal.identifier.thesoz10038485
internal.identifier.thesoz10038509
internal.identifier.thesoz10036566
internal.identifier.thesoz10060976
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo68-71de
internal.identifier.classoz30100
internal.identifier.journal2859
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc100
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2020-22-6-68-71de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
dc.subject.classhort30100de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record