dc.contributor.author | Mijs, Jonathan J. B. | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-30T06:55:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-30T06:55:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1741-3192 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/95397 | |
dc.description.abstract | My contribution to this special issue engages with Michael Sandel's The Tyranny of Meritocracy and its significance to the academic conversation about meritocracy and its discontents. Specifically, I highlight Sandel’s diagnosis of the rise of populism and his proposed remedy for the 'tyranny of merit'. First, building on Menno ter Braak's writings on the rise of fascism, I explore the sources of ressentiment in contemporary societies as stemming not from disillusionment with meritocracy but from the broken promise of liberalism and democracy more generally. Second, I consider Sandel's proposals to reform elite university admissions and to 'recognize work', explore their wider applicability, and reflect on their limitations to meaningfully change how success and failure is socially experienced and morally understood. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Staatsformen und Regierungssysteme | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Systems of governments & states | en |
dc.subject.other | ressentiment; ISSP 1987-1992-1999-2009 | de |
dc.title | Merit and ressentiment: How to tackle the tyranny of merit | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Theory and Research in Education | |
dc.source.volume | 20 | de |
dc.publisher.country | GBR | de |
dc.source.issue | 2 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Staat, staatliche Organisationsformen | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political System, Constitution, Government | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | ISSP | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | ISSP | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Leistung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | achievement | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Ungleichheit | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | inequality | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Meritokratie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | meritocracy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Populismus | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | populism | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Segregation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | segregation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Faschismus | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | fascism | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-95397-5 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | FDB | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10073563 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036344 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041153 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10076062 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10055018 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10057624 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10043357 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 173-181 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10503 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 2990 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 321 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785221106837 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |