Bibtex export
@book{ Heise2024, title = {Dr. Palley and the merits of conflict}, author = {Heise, Arne}, year = {2024}, series = {ZÖSS Discussion Paper}, volume = {105}, address = {Hamburg}, publisher = {Universität Hamburg, Fak. Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, FB Sozialökonomie, Zentrum für Ökonomische und Soziologische Studien (ZÖSS)}, issn = {1868-4947}, urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-95305-2}, abstract = {Controversy is vital in the pursuit of knowledge. Constructive dispute can drive intellectual growth and deepen understanding within a field. However, mutual respect, thorough engagement, and intellectual humility are necessary for productive exchanges. In this vein, I clarify in my response to Tom Palley's critique of my article that I did not argue against his claim regarding social conflict in Keynesian economics. However, I questioned whether social conflict is the sole ontological fault line, as Palley suggests. Additionally, I highlighted the distinction between Keynes' economics and Keynesian economics, challenging Palley's lumping them together as part of a liberal project. In conclusion, Palley's assertions regarding the absence of social conflict in Keynesian economics and its implications for economic laws lack foundation.}, keywords = {Keynes, J.; Keynes, J.; Keynesianismus; Keynesianism; sozialer Konflikt; social conflict; Paradigmenwechsel; paradigm change}}