dc.contributor.author | Heise, Arne | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-25T08:13:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-25T08:13:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1868-4947 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/95305 | |
dc.description.abstract | Controversy is vital in the pursuit of knowledge. Constructive dispute can drive intellectual growth and deepen understanding within a field. However, mutual respect, thorough engagement, and intellectual humility are necessary for productive exchanges. In this vein, I clarify in my response to Tom Palley's critique of my article that I did not argue against his claim regarding social conflict in Keynesian economics. However, I questioned whether social conflict is the sole ontological fault line, as Palley suggests. Additionally, I highlighted the distinction between Keynes' economics and Keynesian economics, challenging Palley's lumping them together as part of a liberal project. In conclusion, Palley's assertions regarding the absence of social conflict in Keynesian economics and its implications for economic laws lack foundation. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Wirtschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Economics | en |
dc.title | Dr. Palley and the merits of conflict | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet | de |
dc.description.review | reviewed | en |
dc.source.volume | 105 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | de |
dc.publisher.city | Hamburg | de |
dc.source.series | ZÖSS Discussion Paper | |
dc.subject.classoz | Allgemeines, spezielle Theorien und Schulen, Methoden, Entwicklung und Geschichte der Wirtschaftswissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Basic Research, General Concepts and History of Economics | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Keynes, J. | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Keynes, J. | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Keynesianismus | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Keynesianism | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | sozialer Konflikt | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | social conflict | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Paradigmenwechsel | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | paradigm change | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-95305-2 | |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10048752 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10048755 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045320 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10074486 | |
dc.type.stock | monograph | de |
dc.type.document | Arbeitspapier | de |
dc.type.document | working paper | en |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10901 | |
internal.identifier.document | 3 | |
dc.contributor.corporateeditor | Universität Hamburg, Fak. Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, FB Sozialökonomie, Zentrum für Ökonomische und Soziologische Studien (ZÖSS) | |
internal.identifier.corporateeditor | 337 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 330 | |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 3 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 2 | |
internal.identifier.series | 627 | |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |