Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorGeppert, Johannade
dc.contributor.authorLietzow, Julikade
dc.contributor.authorHessel-Pras, Stefaniede
dc.contributor.authorKirsch, Fabiande
dc.contributor.authorSchäfer, Berndde
dc.contributor.authorSachse, Benjaminde
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-05T06:39:36Z
dc.date.available2024-06-05T06:39:36Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/94420
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-intoxicating substance of Cannabis sativa L., is gaining consumer attention. Yet, legal regulations in the EU are complex and questions of potential health risks remain partly unanswered. In Germany, little is known about people who use CBD products. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to gain insight into the user group of CBD, reasons for consumption and risk perception towards CBD-containing products. Methods: The study consisted of two parts: In the first part of the study, the prevalence of CBD awareness and usage in Germany was estimated using a telephone survey and a population-representative sample of n = 1,011 respondents. Based on these results, n = 2,000 participants being aware of CBD were surveyed with an online questionnaire in the second part of the study to examine usage and perception of CBD in users and non-users. Results: When the study was conducted at the end of 2020 and beginning of 2021, 40.2% of the German participants had already heard of products containing CBD, and 11.4% had actually used them. 42.1% of the users consumed such products regularly, at least once a week, primarily orally via oils or tinctures, and purchased them mainly online. Besides curiosity - addressed especially in young adults - anticipated health benefits including pain and stress relief were main reasons for use. More than half of the study participants perceived the health benefits of CBD use as high or very high. In contrast, the health risks were rated as low or very low by most respondents. Assumptions about official testing for safety as well as physical effects of CBD-containing products varied between users and non-users. Conclusion: About one in nine people in Germany uses CBD-containing products. Given reasons for consumption and perception of potential health risks and benefits suggest that people are insufficiently informed about CBD-containing products. The results of the study indicate that risk communication is needed to raise awareness for the topic and to inform (potential) users.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherCannabidiol; CBD; consumption; risk perceptionde
dc.titleUsage and health perception of cannabidiol-containing products among the population in Germany: a descriptive study conducted in 2020 and 2021de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalBMC Public Health
dc.source.volume23de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozMedizinsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozMedical Sociologyen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozKonsumde
dc.subject.thesozconsumptionen
dc.subject.thesozGesundheitsverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozhealth behavioren
dc.subject.thesozGesundheitsschadende
dc.subject.thesozdamage to one's healthen
dc.subject.thesozKonsumverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozconsumption behavioren
dc.subject.thesozRisikode
dc.subject.thesozrisken
dc.subject.thesozRisikoabschätzungde
dc.subject.thesozrisk assessmenten
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.subject.thesozTelefoninterviewde
dc.subject.thesoztelephone interviewen
dc.subject.thesozquantitative Methodede
dc.subject.thesozquantitative methoden
dc.subject.thesozMikrozensusde
dc.subject.thesozmicrocensusen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-94420-7
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10035058
internal.identifier.thesoz10045563
internal.identifier.thesoz10038042
internal.identifier.thesoz10048720
internal.identifier.thesoz10045555
internal.identifier.thesoz10056789
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
internal.identifier.thesoz10047975
internal.identifier.thesoz10052183
internal.identifier.thesoz10052284
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-11de
internal.identifier.classoz10215
internal.identifier.journal2013
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17142-0de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record