Bibtex export

 

@article{ Tyfield2022,
 title = {Against and For China's Ecological Civilisation: Economising the Bios or "Life-ising" Transition?},
 author = {Tyfield, David and Rodríguez, Fabricio},
 journal = {International Quarterly for Asian Studies (IQAS)},
 number = {3},
 pages = {441-469},
 volume = {53},
 year = {2022},
 issn = {2566-6878},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.11588/iqas.2022.3.15525},
 abstract = {As the climate crisis intensifies, overlapping with the emergence of a lethal virus, and a planet poisoning economy, questions regarding thinking-and-doing transition become increasingly urgent. In this article, we explore the concept of "ecological civilisation" (EcoCiv) as a productive conjunction of Chinese concepts and ways of thinking that precede China's encounter with Western modernity, and their re-reading and revision from a post-Western modernity lens. China's role in any possible global transition to sustainability is unquestionably central - yet curiously neglected in transition studies. At the same time the official project of EcoCiv is in fact emerging as the very opposite of its proclaimed spirit. The article offers a reconceptualisation of shengtai wenming (ecological civilisation) as a paradigm shift to life-ising the economy (and society) instead of economising life. From this altered perspective, the article presents and discusses preliminary evidence of a largely neglected, but potentially significant, bottom-up, extra-state dynamism in contemporary China that entails both elements and principles for a genuinely ecological, trans-modern civilisation. It concludes with reflections on the resulting change in agenda, not least for transition studies, outlining a set of four principles of doing shengtai wenming - i.e. of life-ising transition.},
 keywords = {China; China; nachhaltige Entwicklung; sustainable development}}