Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKim, Jessicade
dc.contributor.authorFallon, Kathleen M.de
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-13T15:18:34Z
dc.date.available2024-05-13T15:18:34Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn1743-9248de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/94102
dc.description.abstractSince the 1990s, gender quotas have been celebrated for improving women’s equality. Yet their cross-national and longitudinal impact on attitudes toward female politicians and the mechanism through which this process occurs are not well understood. Using multilevel modeling on 87 nations, we examine how different types of quotas, with varied features and levels of strength, shape beliefs about women in politics. We give particular attention to the mechanism of visibility created by quotas in impacting attitudes. Results suggest that unlike quotas with features facilitating low visibility (i.e., weak quotas), those producing high visibility (i.e., robust quotas) significantly impact public approval of women in politics. However, the direction of this effect varies by quota type. Social context also matters. Robust quota effects - both positive and negative - are especially pronounced in democracies but are insignificant in nondemocracies. Limited differences by gender (men versus women) emerge. Theoretical and policy implications are discussed.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherWorld Values Survey, waves 3-6; democracy; exposure; gender; symbolic representationde
dc.titleMaking Women Visible: How Gender Quotas Shape Global Attitudes toward Women in Politicsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalPolitics & Gender
dc.source.volume19de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozFrauen- und Geschlechterforschungde
dc.subject.classozWomen's Studies, Feminist Studies, Gender Studiesen
dc.subject.thesozFraude
dc.subject.thesozwomanen
dc.subject.thesozQuotede
dc.subject.thesozquotaen
dc.subject.thesozGleichstellungde
dc.subject.thesozaffirmative actionen
dc.subject.thesozRepräsentationde
dc.subject.thesozrepresentationen
dc.subject.thesozöffentliche Meinungde
dc.subject.thesozpublic opinionen
dc.subject.thesozPolitikerinde
dc.subject.thesozen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionWZBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10038633
internal.identifier.thesoz10036360
internal.identifier.thesoz10045798
internal.identifier.thesoz10056648
internal.identifier.thesoz10052047
internal.identifier.thesoz10054711
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo981-1006de
internal.identifier.classoz20200
internal.identifier.journal3053
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X23000089de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.econstor.eu/oai/request@@oai:econstor.eu:10419/289866
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record