Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorCoors, Annabellde
dc.contributor.authorHassenstein, Max J.de
dc.contributor.authorKrause, Gérardde
dc.contributor.authorKerrinnes, Tobiasde
dc.contributor.authorHarries, Manuelade
dc.contributor.authorBreteler, Monique M. B.de
dc.contributor.authorCastell, Stefaniede
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-29T09:18:58Z
dc.date.available2024-04-29T09:18:58Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn1756-3305de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/93907
dc.description.abstractBackground: Lyme borreliosis is the most prevalent vector-borne disease in Europe, and numbers might increase due to climate change. However, borreliosis is not notifiable in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW), Germany. Hence, little is known about the current human seroprevalence in NRW. However, the proportion of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato-infected ticks has increased in a NRW nature reserve. The literature suggests increasing age and male sex as risk factors for seropositivity, whereas the influence of socioeconomic status is controversial. Thus, we aimed to determine regional seropositivity for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (B. burgdorferi s.l.) and its risk factors in the Rhineland Study population in Bonn, NRW, and to compare it with previous surveys to evaluate potential effects of climate change. Methods: We assessed seropositivity in 2865 Rhineland Study participants by determining immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies for B. burgdorferi s.l. using a two-step algorithm combining enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests and line immunoblots. We calculated the odds of being classified as IgG or IgM positive as a function of age, sex, and educational level using binomial logistic regression models. We applied varying seropositivity classifications and weights considering age, sex and education to compensate for differences between the sample and regional population characteristics. Results: IgG antibodies for B. burgdorferi s.l. were present in 2.4% and IgM antibodies in 0.6% of the participants (weighted: 2.2% [IgG], 0.6% [IgM]). The likelihood of IgG seropositivity increased by 3.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5–5.2%) per 1 year increase in age. Men had 1.65 times the odds for IgG seropositivity as women (95% CI 1.01–2.73), and highly educated participants had 1.83 times the odds (95% CI 1.10–3.14) as participants with an intermediate level of education. We found no statistically significant link between age, sex, or education and IgM seropositivity. Our weighted and age-standardized IgG seroprevalence was comparable to the preceding serosurvey German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS) for NRW. Conclusions: We confirmed that increasing age and male sex are associated with increased odds for IgG seropositivity and provide evidence for increased seropositivity in the highly educated group. B. burgdorferi s.l. seropositivity remained constant over the past decade in this regional German population.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherlyme diseas; seroepidemiological studies; immunoglobulin G; immunoglobulin M; antibodies; ticks; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; immunoblotting; tick-borne diseases; Mikrozensus 2020de
dc.titleRegional seropositivity for Borrelia burgdorferi and associated risk factors: findings from the Rhineland Study, Germanyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalParasites & Vectors
dc.source.volume15de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozMedizinsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozMedical Sociologyen
dc.subject.thesozMikrozensusde
dc.subject.thesozmicrocensusen
dc.subject.thesozKrankheitde
dc.subject.thesozillnessen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozNordrhein-Westfalende
dc.subject.thesozNorth Rhine-Westphaliaen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-93907-0
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10052284
internal.identifier.thesoz10035075
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10040097
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-11de
internal.identifier.classoz10215
internal.identifier.journal2926
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05354-zde
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record