Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHeidbrink, Christianede
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Conradde
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-14T11:36:51Z
dc.date.available2024-03-14T11:36:51Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn1868-4874de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/93044
dc.description.abstractChina's Digital Belt and Road (DBAR) is sending the offer of a technological upgrade around the world. Foreign perceptions of the DBAR pave the way to success through a cooperative attitude or to failure through resistance and confrontation. The United States of America (USA), in particular, plays a prominent role. The power rivalry between Washington and Beijing also affects foreign initiatives such as the DBAR. However, it remains underresearched, how the DBAR is perceived in the USA. The article fills this gap by analysing documents issued by US state bodies as well as three non-partisan think tanks between 2016 and mid-2021. Since no previous study has examined both securitised and desecuritised DBAR frames, we present a new research framework. The results show that negative perceptions of the DBAR prevail among think tanks and political elites. This suggests hardened fronts in the heated technological competition due to confrontational attitudes.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.otherBelt and Road Initiative; Rivalität von Staaten; Securitization; Technologietransfer; Versicherheitlichungde
dc.titleFraming the Digital Silk Road's (de)securitisationde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/18681026221117567de
dc.source.journalJournal of Current Chinese Affairs
dc.source.volume52de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozDigitalisierungde
dc.subject.thesozdigitalizationen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Politikde
dc.subject.thesozinternational politicsen
dc.subject.thesozSicherheitde
dc.subject.thesozsecurityen
dc.subject.thesozWahrnehmungde
dc.subject.thesozperceptionen
dc.subject.thesozUSAde
dc.subject.thesozUnited States of Americaen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGIGAde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10063943
internal.identifier.thesoz10037372
internal.identifier.thesoz10036566
internal.identifier.thesoz10040719
internal.identifier.thesoz10041244
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo311-333de
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.journal192
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/18681026221117567de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://unapi.k10plus.de@@1869537831
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record