Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHasmath, Rezade
dc.contributor.authorHildebrandt, Timothyde
dc.contributor.authorTeets, Jessica C.de
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Jennifer Y. J.de
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Carolyn L.de
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-07T12:43:19Z
dc.date.available2024-03-07T12:43:19Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn1868-4874de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/92835
dc.description.abstractChinese citizens are relatively happy with the state's management of national disasters and emergencies. However, they are increasingly concluding that the state alone cannot manage them. Leveraging the 2018 and 2020 Civic Participation in China Surveys, we find that more educated citizens conclude that the government has a leading role in crisis management, but there is ample room for civil society organisations (CSOs) to act in a complementary fashion. On a slightly diverging path, volunteers who have meaningfully interacted with CSOs are more skeptical than non-volunteers about CSOs’ organisational ability to fulfill this crisis management function. These findings imply that the political legitimacy of the Communist Party of China is not challenged by allowing CSOs a greater role in crisis management.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherKatastrophenhilfe; Legitimation von Herrschaft; Verhältnis gesellschaftliche Vereinigung - Staatde
dc.titleCitizens' expectations for crisis management and the involvement of civil society organisations in Chinade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/18681026211052052de
dc.source.journalJournal of Current Chinese Affairs
dc.source.volume51de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozKrisenmanagementde
dc.subject.thesozcrisis management (econ., pol.)en
dc.subject.thesozKatastrophenschutzde
dc.subject.thesozdisaster controlen
dc.subject.thesozöffentliche Meinungde
dc.subject.thesozpublic opinionen
dc.subject.thesozInformationspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozinformation policyen
dc.subject.thesozautoritäres Systemde
dc.subject.thesozauthoritarian systemen
dc.subject.thesozstaatliche Lenkungde
dc.subject.thesozgovernment controlen
dc.subject.thesozLegitimationde
dc.subject.thesozlegitimationen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGIGAde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10050112
internal.identifier.thesoz10062987
internal.identifier.thesoz10052047
internal.identifier.thesoz10047391
internal.identifier.thesoz10046573
internal.identifier.thesoz10054892
internal.identifier.thesoz10050763
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo292-312de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal192
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/18681026211052052de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://unapi.k10plus.de@@1816366846
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record