Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorNeuert, Corneliade
dc.contributor.authorRoßmann, Jossde
dc.contributor.authorSilber, Henningde
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-27T09:20:22Z
dc.date.available2024-02-27T09:20:22Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2001-7367de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/92484
dc.description.abstractGrid questions are frequently employed in web surveys due to their assumed response efficiency. In line with this, many previous studies have found shorter response times for grid questions compared to item-by-item formats. Our contribution to this literature is to investigate how altering the question format affects response behavior and the depth of cognitive processing when answering both grid question and item-by-item formats. To answer these questions, we implemented an experiment with three questions in an eye-tracking study. Each question consisted of a set of ten items which respondents answered either on a single page (large grid), on two pages with five items each (small grid), or on ten separate pages (item-by-item). We did not find substantial differences in cognitive processing overall, while the processing of the question stem and the response scale labels was significantly higher for the item-by-item design than for the large grid in all three questions. We, however, found that when answering an item in a grid question, respondents often refer to surrounding items when making a judgement. We discuss the findings and limitations of our study and provide suggestions for practical design decisions.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherWeb surveys; response behavior; cognitive processing; question design; eye-tracking methodologyde
dc.titleUsing Eye-Tracking Methodology to Study Grid Question Designs in Web Surveysde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Official Statistics
dc.source.volume39de
dc.publisher.countryMISCde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozkognitive Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozcognitive factorsen
dc.subject.thesozFragebogende
dc.subject.thesozquestionnaireen
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 3.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10049141
internal.identifier.thesoz10037914
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo79-101de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal201
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2023-0004de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence19
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record