Endnote export

 

%T Being and Relation in the Posthuman Age
%A Rhee, Young
%J Society and Power (Socium i vlast)
%N 5
%P 7-12
%D 2020
%K transhumanism; posthumanism; ressentment
%@ 2949-0731
%> https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-92291-4
%X What will be the posthuman society? As usual,
there are two prospects: the pessimistic view and
the optimistic view. According to pessimistic view,
as technologies advance emerge new beings called
as transhuman with enhanced intelligence and
physical power, and extremely long lifespan and
they will dominate humans. On the other hand,
according to optimistic view, technology will benefit
humans, so humans evolve via transhuman to posthuman with smart machines. There are complex
issues tangled together in the dispute between
the rival views, especially such as the natural vs.
artificial beings, human dignity and equality, and
meaning of life. The aim of this article is to examine
being and relation in posthuman age in the point of
Nietzsche’s philosophy. I examine transhuman as a
typical being of posthuman age and ressentiment
as its relation respectively. Nietzsche has influenced
the rise of transhumanism and posthumanism, as
can be seen from direct or indirect confessions
from pioneers of them, though there are debates
about whether the influence is real or superficial.
By paying particular attention to Nietzsche’s idea
of Master and Slave, ressentiment, and Overman
(Übermensch), I contend that (a) in the posthuman
age new classes will emerge, which correspond to
Master and Slave, (b) there will be a new ressentiment of Slaves toward their Masters, and (c) Overman as a creator of new value will be required in
order to solve the problem by ressentiment.
%C RUS
%G en
%9 Zeitschriftenartikel
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info