Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKanojia, Siddharthde
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T14:21:26Z
dc.date.available2024-02-07T14:21:26Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn1857-9760de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/92012
dc.description.abstractThe emergence of over-the-top (OTT) services has lately revolutionized the way people consume media content. These services have emerged as a significant disruptor in the media industry in recent years. With the advent of OTT platforms, various concerns have arisen over the censorship and regulation of content on these platforms. Accordingly, this paper has examined the current trends in censorship and regulation of OTT content through the perusal of various legal and regulatory frameworks in the United Kingdom, India, and China. It has probed into cases of censorship and examined various aspects of civil and political liberties. The analysis has revealed a persuasive connection between the degree of freedom of expression and creative freedom dispensed in each region. Lastly, the paper has provided recommendations for policymakers and other stakeholders on balancing the need for freedom of expression and access to information with responsible content management and regulation.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otherOTT Platforms; Legal Framework; Regulatory Framework; Freedom of Expressionde
dc.titleCreative freedom and censorship: a comparative analysis of regulatory framework for OTT contents in the UK, India, and Chinade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Liberty and International Affairs
dc.source.volume9de
dc.publisher.countryMISCde
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozinteraktive, elektronische Mediende
dc.subject.classozInteractive, electronic Mediaen
dc.subject.classozMedienpolitik, Informationspolitik, Medienrechtde
dc.subject.classozMedia Politics, Information Politics, Media Lawen
dc.subject.thesozZensurde
dc.subject.thesozcensorshipen
dc.subject.thesozGroßbritanniende
dc.subject.thesozGreat Britainen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozIndiende
dc.subject.thesozIndiaen
dc.subject.thesozMedienkonsumde
dc.subject.thesozmedia consumptionen
dc.subject.thesozMeinungsfreiheitde
dc.subject.thesozfreedom of opinionen
dc.subject.thesozRahmenbedingungde
dc.subject.thesozgeneral conditionsen
dc.subject.thesozrechtliche Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozlegal factorsen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10055166
internal.identifier.thesoz10042102
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10042315
internal.identifier.thesoz10069355
internal.identifier.thesoz10044177
internal.identifier.thesoz10055889
internal.identifier.thesoz10054786
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo265-280de
internal.identifier.classoz1080404
internal.identifier.classoz1080411
internal.identifier.journal719
internal.identifier.document32
dc.rights.sherpaGrüner Verlagde
dc.rights.sherpaGreen Publisheren
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2393246kde
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.sherpa1
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record