dc.contributor.author | Blok, Lisanne de | de |
dc.contributor.author | Vries, Catherine E. de | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-31T06:41:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-31T06:41:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1741-2757 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/91707 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study examines public preferences for two forms of differentiated integration (DI): opt-outs and multi-speed EU. Due to the low salience of DI in domestic politics, we suggest that people use ideological benchmarks when forming opinions about DI mostly relating to their general predispositions towards the EU. While pro-EU citizens are more in favor of DI in the form of multiple speeds as this might pose a solution to overcome gridlock, Euroskeptic citizens display more support for opt-outs as a means to accommodate concerns about national identity and control. These differences are in turn accentuated by people’s left-right ideology. We test our hypotheses using public opinion data from the Eurobarometer between 2004 and 2018 and complete it with novel survey data. Our results suggest that while support for DI has increased in recent years, DI preferences largely coincide with ideological predispositions. Our findings indicate that rather than overcoming preference heterogeneity within the EU, DI might entrench existing fault lines. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.other | differentiated integration; EU support; public opinion; Eurobarometer 2004-2018 | de |
dc.title | A blessing and a curse? Examining public preferences for differentiated integration | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | European Union Politics | |
dc.source.volume | 24 | de |
dc.publisher.country | GBR | de |
dc.source.issue | 1 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Europapolitik | de |
dc.subject.classoz | European Politics | en |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Eurobarometer | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Eurobarometer | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | EU | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | EU | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | europäische Integration | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | European integration | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | EU-Staat | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | EU member state | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | öffentliche Meinung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | public opinion | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Innenpolitik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | domestic policy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Meinungsbildung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | opinion formation | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-91707-3 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | FDB | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10083052 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041441 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042896 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10058883 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10052047 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10047493 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041758 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 143-163 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10506 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 126 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221133671 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |