Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBalakina, Julia V.de
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-23T08:34:07Z
dc.date.available2024-01-23T08:34:07Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2310-0524de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/91492
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to analyse the strategies supporting the German Government’s biopolitical health and life protection practices and how they were promoted in the discourse of non-state media outlets during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is assumed that non-state media used various pandemic communication strategies to achieve common biopolitical goals, striking a balance between propaganda and outreach. A comparative analysis was conducted of German publications that focused on the pandemic and appeared during the four waves (January 2020 - March 2022). A total of 54,515 texts from the German media (Süddeutsche Zeitung, Die Zeit, Die Tageszeitung) were examined. Methodologically, the study draws on the Herman-Chomsky propaganda model and Jacques Ellul’s concept. The results show that non-state media employ different communication strategies in line with the filters of the Herman-Chomsky model. All the media outlets maintained a balance between propaganda and public outreach, supporting the Government's biopolitical programme whilst prioritising their own interests. It can be concluded that the strategies chosen by the non-state media outlets instilled a sense of confidence, prompting the public to comply with the restrictions and measures consistent with the biopolitical agenda of the state.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otherCOVID-19 pandemicde
dc.titleInformation and propaganda strategies in German non-state media discourse during the COVID-19 pandemicde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalBaltic Region
dc.source.volume15de
dc.publisher.countryRUSde
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozMedieninhalte, Aussagenforschungde
dc.subject.classozMedia Contents, Content Analysisen
dc.subject.classozWirkungsforschung, Rezipientenforschungde
dc.subject.classozImpact Research, Recipient Researchen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozBiopolitikde
dc.subject.thesozbiotechnology policyen
dc.subject.thesozGesundheitspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozhealth policyen
dc.subject.thesozPropagandade
dc.subject.thesozpropagandaen
dc.subject.thesozMediende
dc.subject.thesozmediaen
dc.subject.thesozZeitungde
dc.subject.thesoznewspaperen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10054696
internal.identifier.thesoz10045550
internal.identifier.thesoz10034736
internal.identifier.thesoz10035302
internal.identifier.thesoz10034416
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo29-44de
internal.identifier.classoz1080405
internal.identifier.classoz1080407
internal.identifier.journal38
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2023-3-2de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record