Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBakhshaliyeva, Afsanade
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-19T15:02:53Z
dc.date.available2024-01-19T15:02:53Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2413-9009de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/91454
dc.description.abstractVarious concepts are verbalized and reflected in language units. These language units exist in different structures. Ideas are mainly realized in the form of fixed expressions. Fixed expressions, in turn, possess other structures. In this linguistic landscape of the world, selected words have their unique and distinct place.The concepts of "friend" and "enemy", while fundamentally within the domain of cognitive linguistics, are primarily linguistic units. Several linguistic teams converge around a particular sign. Their similarity to each other unites them within a paradigmatic framework. Characters with single paradigms enter into associative relations with each other. There exist universal paradigms in language, the universality of which does not depend on individual specific languages and their specific characteristics. The concepts of "friend" and "enemy" are included in these universal paradigms, which are present in all languages.Paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations create a system. This situation is based on the logic of natural processes. For instance, one of the factors that led to the development of the language system is the constant and reciprocal manifestation of two opposing approaches, two regularities. The first of such images are concepts that form opposite poles. Several aspects can be distinguished within linguistics's foreign and local cognitive direction framework.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcLiteratur, Rhetorik, Literaturwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcLiterature, rhetoric and criticismen
dc.subject.otherfriend; enemy; concept; cognitive; linguisticsde
dc.titleStructural-Grammatical Characteristics of "Frıend" and "Enemy" Conceptual Expressionsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://pathofscience.org/index.php/ps/article/view/2910/1259de
dc.source.journalPath of Science
dc.source.volume9de
dc.publisher.countryMISCde
dc.source.issue9de
dc.subject.classozLiteraturwissenschaft, Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistikde
dc.subject.classozScience of Literature, Linguisticsen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo2001-2006de
internal.identifier.classoz30200
internal.identifier.journal1570
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc800
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22178/pos.96-1de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://pathofscience.org/index.php/index/oai/@@oai:ojs.pathofscience.org:article/2910
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record