dc.contributor.author | Hurrelmann, Achim | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-15T13:59:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-15T13:59:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2183-2463 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/90507 | |
dc.description.abstract | The concept of constitutional abeyances, originally proposed by Foley (1989), describes aspects of a political system that are left deliberately ambiguous. Foley suggests that the maintenance and management of such areas of "settled unsettlement" are indispensable to prevent and resolve conflict about a polity’s constitutional order. The concept of constitutional abeyances has been used productively to analyze constitutional development in Canada, especially the country’s constitutional crises in the 1980s and 1990s. However, with very few exceptions, it has not been applied to analyze the EU and its treaty development. This article leverages the comparison to Canada to argue that a focus on constitutional abeyances, and their successful or unsuccessful institutional reproduction, provides fresh perspectives for analyzing European integration, including insights into the emergence of the EU's current crises and principles that might guide a political response. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Internationale Beziehungen | de |
dc.subject.ddc | International relations | en |
dc.subject.other | constitutional abeyances; historical institutionalism; institutional development | de |
dc.title | Constitutional Abeyances: Reflecting on EU Treaty Development in Light of the Canadian Experience | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6835/3276 | de |
dc.source.journal | Politics and Governance | |
dc.source.volume | 11 | de |
dc.publisher.country | PRT | de |
dc.source.issue | 3 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | internationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitik | de |
dc.subject.classoz | International Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Kanada | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Canada | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | EU | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | EU | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | institutioneller Wandel | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | institutional change | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Verfassungsrecht | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | constitutional law | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | europäische Integration | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | European integration | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10048494 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041441 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10047604 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10061146 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042896 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 241-250 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10505 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 787 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 327 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | United in Uniqueness? Lessons From Canadian Politics for European Union Studies | de |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6835 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.dda.reference | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6835 | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |