dc.contributor.author | Salvati, Federico | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-30T08:42:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-30T08:42:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1434-419X | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/90141 | |
dc.description.abstract | Why do countries like China and Russia appeal to international law to support their policy? In addition, why is the liberal system in a crisis if ideas like democracy and human rights are so pervasive within the political debate? In the following paper, I will try to answer these questions by looking at how liberal theory has influenced the development of today’s governance structure. I will then move to comment on what I call the "liberal bias" of international governance referring to relevant literature on the concept of categorisation and categorical thought in neuroscience and cognitive psychology. Finally, following my theoretical baseline, I will present a quick analysis of how autocracies use linguistic categories to influence the evolution of liberal values. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Staatsformen und Regierungssysteme | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Systems of governments & states | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.other | liberal bias; framing | de |
dc.title | Liberal Bias: Why the International Governance System is Struggling and the Contestation Strategies of Authoritarian States | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet | de |
dc.description.review | reviewed | en |
dc.source.volume | 90 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | de |
dc.publisher.city | Berlin | de |
dc.source.series | Arbeitspapiere des Osteuropa-Instituts der Freien Universität Berlin, Arbeitsschwerpunkt Politik | |
dc.subject.classoz | Staat, staatliche Organisationsformen | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political System, Constitution, Government | en |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | China | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | China | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Russland | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Russia | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Diktatur | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | dictatorship | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Governance | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | governance | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Linguistik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | linguistics | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Liberalismus | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | liberalism | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Völkerrecht | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | law of nations | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-90141-8 | |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040272 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10057012 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041078 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054891 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040388 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10051198 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038275 | |
dc.type.stock | monograph | de |
dc.type.document | Arbeitspapier | de |
dc.type.document | working paper | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 16 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10503 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.document | 3 | |
dc.contributor.corporateeditor | Freie Universität Berlin, Osteuropa-Institut Abt. Politik | |
internal.identifier.corporateeditor | 601 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 321 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 3 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 2 | |
internal.identifier.series | 874 | |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | false | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |