dc.contributor.author | Baidhowi, Robby Auzini | de |
dc.contributor.author | Hirsanuddin, Hirsanuddin | de |
dc.contributor.author | Suhartana, Lalu Wira Pria | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-11T08:47:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-11T08:47:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2413-9009 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/89602 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study aims to analyse the restoration mechanisms of an authentic deed that has been cancelled. The study involves a normative legal analysis that utilises secondary data, including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The study adopts a methodology employing statute, conceptual, and case approaches.As a result, the agreement is considered to have a formal defect and the act of creating the agreement is deemed unlawful. An authentic agreement can only be restored by annulling the court’s decision through an appeal and a cassation decision, followed by an extraordinary legal remedy called a review to cancel the cassation decision. It is important to note that the restoration of an authentic agreement can only occur within an ongoing trial, and there is no other way to recover a cancelled original agreement outside of this. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Recht | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Law | en |
dc.subject.other | Authentic Deed; Cancellation; Restoration; Notary; PPAT | de |
dc.title | Restoration Mechanisms of Cancelled Authentic Deed | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Path of Science | |
dc.source.volume | 9 | de |
dc.publisher.country | MISC | de |
dc.source.issue | 5 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Recht | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Law | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Notar | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | notary public | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Dokument | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | document | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | rechtliche Faktoren | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | legal factors | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10053381 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041217 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054786 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 6014-6030 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 40101 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 1570 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 340 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.92-21 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.dda.reference | https://pathofscience.org/index.php/index/oai/@@oai:ojs.pathofscience.org:article/2567 | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |