Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorMüller, Thomasde
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T15:18:06Z
dc.date.available2023-09-18T15:18:06Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/89153
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the degree to which commercial satellite imagery has empowered non-state actors in the politics of transparency in world politics. This question has received renewed attention in the wake of the disclosure of China's new missile silos in 2021 as well as Russia’s war against Ukraine since 2022. The article contributes to research on this question by teasing out the competition over authority undergirding the politics of transparency. It does so in two steps: it conceptualizes the politics of transparency as involving a combination of state and non-state actors engaging in transparency efforts against another state or other states and it distinguishes four aspects of the empowerment of non-state actors in such constellations of actors: (a) the emergence of new or better disclosure devices that (b) bolster the expertise of some non-state actors, (c) giving them more influence over public debates, and (d) prompting changes in the policies of relevant actors. The article uses this framework to explore the factors that affected the degree of empowerment of non-state actors in the two cases of China’s new missile silos as well as Russia's war against Ukraine. It highlights three factors: the interplay between state and non-state transparency makers, the polarization of public spheres, and the ability of states targeted by the transparency efforts to fragment public spheres.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.othercommercial satellitesde
dc.titleSatellites and the Changing Politics of Transparency in World Politicsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6784/3340de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume11de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozRusslandde
dc.subject.thesozRussiaen
dc.subject.thesozAutoritätde
dc.subject.thesozauthorityen
dc.subject.thesozTransparenzde
dc.subject.thesoztransparencyen
dc.subject.thesozFragmentierungde
dc.subject.thesozfragmentationen
dc.subject.thesozWeltpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozworld politicsen
dc.subject.thesozpolitischer Akteurde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical actoren
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10057012
internal.identifier.thesoz10037548
internal.identifier.thesoz10066371
internal.identifier.thesoz10079285
internal.identifier.thesoz10037373
internal.identifier.thesoz10064200
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo178-188de
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.source.issuetopicPublics in Global Politicsde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6784de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6784
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record