Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorLi, Yulongde
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yuxide
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Mingfengde
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-10T12:54:15Z
dc.date.available2023-08-10T12:54:15Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/88430
dc.description.abstractResearchers have discussed Hong Kong’s localist identities, nativist sentiments, and populism, but have not widely examined the extent to which populism could be perceived in education in Hong Kong. As the chief participants of the Occupying Central and the radical Anti-Extradition Bill movements in Hong Kong were students, this suggests the need to explore the relationship between populism and education, particularly the then-controversial liberal studies textbooks. According to contemporary news reports, liberal studies textbooks contained much content stigmatising the Chinese mainland. Previous studies of liberal studies textbooks applied qualitative discourse analysis methods. In this study, mixed-method analysis was applied to a specialised corpus comprising seven commercial liberal studies textbooks containing 248,339 Chinese characters in total to explore the extent to which liberal studies textbooks contain information concerning the key features of populism—the heightened division between the inner and outer groups. A division was found between positive images of Hong Kong and negative images of China in the narratives of commercial liberal studies textbooks. Accordingly, the textbooks can be understood to contain populism. The present study advocates that relevant educational watchdogs in Hong Kong provide more guidance on the writing and publishing of liberal studies textbooks in the future, keeping the enquiry-based spirit of the liberal studies course fulfilled, and urges stakeholders of Hong Kong education to consider teaching peace education and developing a more inclusive environment.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.ddcLiteratur, Rhetorik, Literaturwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcLiterature, rhetoric and criticismen
dc.subject.othercorpus linguistics; liberal studiesde
dc.titleA Corpus‐Based Discourse Analysis of Liberal Studies Textbooks in Hong Kong: Legitimatizing Populismde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6550/3114de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume11de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozLiteraturwissenschaft, Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistikde
dc.subject.classozScience of Literature, Linguisticsen
dc.subject.thesozHongkongde
dc.subject.thesozHong Kongen
dc.subject.thesozPopulismusde
dc.subject.thesozpopulismen
dc.subject.thesozLehrbuchde
dc.subject.thesoztextbooken
dc.subject.thesozBildungswesende
dc.subject.thesozeducation systemen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozStigmatisierungde
dc.subject.thesozstigmatizationen
dc.subject.thesozLinguistikde
dc.subject.thesozlinguisticsen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10046882
internal.identifier.thesoz10055018
internal.identifier.thesoz10050779
internal.identifier.thesoz10038352
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10059362
internal.identifier.thesoz10040388
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo261-271de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.classoz30200
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
internal.identifier.ddc800
dc.source.issuetopicHate Speech, Demonization, Polarization, and Political Social Responsibilityde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6550de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6550
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record