Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBachand, Rémide
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T12:39:18Z
dc.date.available2023-08-09T12:39:18Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/88379
dc.description.abstractIf one wants to get a grasp on the international institutional arrangement of what J. G. Ruggie called “embedded liberalism,” which included the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), one must first carefully examine the conditions that made the regime of accumulation called Fordism possible. More precisely, it is essential to grasp how the particular evolution of class struggle in the US strongly influenced the organization of capitalism in this country, and subsequently the international institutions at the core of the embedded liberalism. Simply put, the thesis defended in this article is that the evolution of class struggle in the US in the 1930s and the following decades has been the main influence in the shaping of Fordism and an undervalued factor in the creation of the GATT. The GATT, in other words, is an agreement that strongly corresponds to the necessity of the management of the class struggle associated with Fordism.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.otherregime of accumulationde
dc.titleClass Struggle and International Economic Institutions: The Origins of the GATT and "Embedded Liberalism"de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5958/3079de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume11de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozWirtschaftspolitikde
dc.subject.classozEconomic Policyen
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.thesozFordismusde
dc.subject.thesozfordismen
dc.subject.thesozGATTde
dc.subject.thesozGATTen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Organisationde
dc.subject.thesozinternational organizationen
dc.subject.thesozLiberalismusde
dc.subject.thesozliberalismen
dc.subject.thesozinternationales Abkommende
dc.subject.thesozinternational agreementen
dc.subject.thesozFreihandelde
dc.subject.thesozfree tradeen
dc.subject.thesozKlassenkampfde
dc.subject.thesozclass struggleen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10058641
internal.identifier.thesoz10044169
internal.identifier.thesoz10043348
internal.identifier.thesoz10051198
internal.identifier.thesoz10034390
internal.identifier.thesoz10044165
internal.identifier.thesoz10048958
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo193-202de
internal.identifier.classoz1090302
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc330
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.source.issuetopicRe-Embedding Trade in the Shadow of Populismde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.5958de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5958
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record