Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSchnell, Izhakde
dc.contributor.authorArnon, Ben-Israelde
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-08T14:31:03Z
dc.date.available2023-08-08T14:31:03Z
dc.date.issued2011de
dc.identifier.issn2067-4082de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/88353
dc.description.abstractImmediately after the 1967 war and the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza the national religious youngsters (Gush Emmunim settlers) reached out to settle the new frontier of the biblical places. By thus, they have developed a Messianic myth. The interpretation of Gush-Emmunim settlers' experience of landscapes reveals a complex and contradictory structure of sense of space. Settlers' mythical sense of space may be understood in two strata - imagined and material. The imagined stratum is conceived mainly in transcendental romantic terms while the material is reified according to classic conceptions. Two main contradictions are outstanding: first, between the romantic representation of Jewish landscapes and the classic representation of Palestinian landscapes in the imagined stratum; second, between the romantic representation of the Jewish home space in the imagined stratum and the classical representation of the suburban Jewish home landscape in the material stratum. The first contradiction is inherent in frontier societies as a means to pseudo-rationalize the colonisation of the land, although in general there may be a mixture of romantic and classic attitudes towards the natives. The settlers pioneering myth is highly subsidised by the government and aggressively backed by military force. This enables them to tolerate the surrounding fear, antagonism and hatred. Thus, the landscape they build represents power and domination with no regard to local nature and to the Palestinian landscapes that are perceived by the settlers as part of it.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.othercolonization; frontier societies; Romantic and Classis visions of human-nature synergyde
dc.titleNeo-Zionist frontier landscapes in the occupied territoriesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Urban and Regional Analysis
dc.source.volume3de
dc.publisher.countryROUde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.thesozSiedlungsgebietde
dc.subject.thesozsettlement areaen
dc.subject.thesozbesetztes Gebietde
dc.subject.thesozoccupied territoryen
dc.subject.thesozreligiöse Bewegungde
dc.subject.thesozreligious movementen
dc.subject.thesozZionismusde
dc.subject.thesozzionismen
dc.subject.thesozWeltanschauungde
dc.subject.thesozWeltanschauungen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionTel Aviv University, Israelde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10057900
internal.identifier.thesoz10038708
internal.identifier.thesoz10048163
internal.identifier.thesoz10062965
internal.identifier.thesoz10047015
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo175-194de
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal2707
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.37043/JURA.2011.3.2.4de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence32
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort20700de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.ocrnull Page_20
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record