Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSchlipphak, Berndde
dc.contributor.authorIsani, Mujtabade
dc.contributor.authorBack, Mitja D.de
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-08T07:56:35Z
dc.date.available2023-08-08T07:56:35Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/88333
dc.description.abstractA plentitude of research has analyzed citizens' belief in conspiracy theories and its individual‐level correlates. Yet, the effects of (political) context factors on the causes and effects of individual belief in conspiracy theories are still neglected. However, such context should be especially relevant when it comes to the impact of one’s belief in conspiracy theories on one's political preference. In this article, we argue that the communication of governmental actors exerts a moderating influence on the link leading from a belief in conspiracy theories to political attitudes. In a nutshell, the belief in conspiracy theories should make citizens less likely to distrust their government - and the political system in general - in contexts where these theories are shared or at least publicly represented by governmental actors. Using two original data sets with data from Germany, Poland, and Jordan (Study 1) and data from Germany, Poland, Sweden, and France (Study 2), we test our argument based on an overall sample of about 10,000 cases. Our results indicate that higher degrees of generic conspiracy theories beliefs are associated with higher levels of political distrust across countries. Yet, confirming our argument, such an effect takes place less strongly in those countries in which governmental actors use conspiracy theories as a political communication strategy.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherconspiracy beliefs; conspiracy mentality; conspiracy theories; political trustde
dc.titleConspiracy Theory Beliefs and Political Trust: The Moderating Role of Political Communicationde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5755/2955de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume10de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Kommunikationde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical communicationen
dc.subject.thesozIdeologiede
dc.subject.thesozideologyen
dc.subject.thesozGlaubede
dc.subject.thesozfaithen
dc.subject.thesozDesinformationde
dc.subject.thesozdisinformationen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10049299
internal.identifier.thesoz10039894
internal.identifier.thesoz10045784
internal.identifier.thesoz10063936
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo157-167de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.source.issuetopicThe Role of Religions and Conspiracy Theories in Democratic and Authoritarian Regimesde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5755de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5755
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record