Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorXu, Jinghongde
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Difande
dc.contributor.authorXu, Jingde
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Changde
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-02T07:54:35Z
dc.date.available2023-08-02T07:54:35Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2439de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/88152
dc.description.abstractThis article explores science communication about Omicron on Weibo by eight actors from November 2021 to June 2022. Regarding the themes of vaccines, symptoms, and medicines, we examined the actors’ communication with content analysis, presented the interactions of different actors using social network analysis, and assessed the impact of weibos on public sentiment using SnowNLP and descriptive statistics. The results showed that scientists are still the most important actors, focusing on science issues and using contrasting and contextual frames. Central-level media play an essential mediating role, relaying scientific knowledge. Science communication on Weibo had a positive impact on public sentiment.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherCovid-19; Omicron; Weibo; public sentiment; science communication; sentiment analysisde
dc.titleHow Do Multiple Actors Conduct Science Communication About Omicron on Weibo: A Mixed-Method Studyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6122/3133de
dc.source.journalMedia and Communication
dc.source.volume11de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozinteraktive, elektronische Mediende
dc.subject.classozInteractive, electronic Mediaen
dc.subject.classozMedieninhalte, Aussagenforschungde
dc.subject.classozMedia Contents, Content Analysisen
dc.subject.classozWissenschaftssoziologie, Wissenschaftsforschung, Technikforschung, Techniksoziologiede
dc.subject.classozSociology of Science, Sociology of Technology, Research on Science and Technologyen
dc.subject.thesozSoziale Mediende
dc.subject.thesozsocial mediaen
dc.subject.thesozEpidemiede
dc.subject.thesozepidemicen
dc.subject.thesozWissenschaftde
dc.subject.thesozscienceen
dc.subject.thesozKommunikationde
dc.subject.thesozcommunicationen
dc.subject.thesozBerichterstattungde
dc.subject.thesozreportingen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10094228
internal.identifier.thesoz10042424
internal.identifier.thesoz10062479
internal.identifier.thesoz10035149
internal.identifier.thesoz10038258
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo306-322de
internal.identifier.classoz1080404
internal.identifier.classoz1080405
internal.identifier.classoz10220
internal.identifier.journal793
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.source.issuetopicScience Communication in the Digital Age: New Actors, Environments, and Practicesde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6122de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6122
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record