Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorShehata, Adamde
dc.contributor.authorStrömbäck, Jesperde
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-24T15:27:38Z
dc.date.available2023-07-24T15:27:38Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2439de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/87916
dc.description.abstractHow citizens' perceptions of societal problems are shaped by media use has been a critical question in media effects research for decades. This study addresses a specific puzzle concerning media effects in contemporary fragmented media environments: the dual role of media trust as both (a) an antecedent variable guiding news selection and (b) a moderator variable conditioning the effects of news use on perceptions of societal problems. Building upon the differential susceptibility to media effects model, we analyze the role of media trust for citizens’ orientation towards mainstream and alternative news media - and how such usage influences perceptions of two major societal issues: health care and school. Findings from a four-wave panel survey conducted in Sweden suggest that public service and alternative news use matter for citizens' perceptions of societal problems and that media trust influences news choices and may, partly, condition media effects.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otheralternative media; media effects; media trust; media use; societal perceptionsde
dc.titleMedia Use and Societal Perceptions: The Dual Role of Media Trustde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5449de
dc.source.journalMedia and Communication
dc.source.volume10de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozWirkungsforschung, Rezipientenforschungde
dc.subject.classozImpact Research, Recipient Researchen
dc.subject.thesozMedienverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozmedia behavioren
dc.subject.thesozMassenmediende
dc.subject.thesozmass mediaen
dc.subject.thesozVertrauende
dc.subject.thesozconfidenceen
dc.subject.thesozSelektionde
dc.subject.thesozselectionen
dc.subject.thesozNachrichtende
dc.subject.thesoznewsen
dc.subject.thesozSchwedende
dc.subject.thesozSwedenen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10051166
internal.identifier.thesoz10037618
internal.identifier.thesoz10061508
internal.identifier.thesoz10037471
internal.identifier.thesoz10052870
internal.identifier.thesoz10057535
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo146-157de
internal.identifier.classoz1080407
internal.identifier.journal793
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.source.issuetopicEnlightening Confusion: How Contradictory Findings Help Mitigate Problematic Trends in Digital Democraciesde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5449de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5449
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record