Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorTassinari, Virginiade
dc.contributor.authorVergani, Francescode
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-21T08:44:18Z
dc.date.available2023-07-21T08:44:18Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/87833
dc.description.abstractMany neighbourhoods are currently serving as laboratories where new methods are being explored for collaboratively redesigning cities and tackling the social, environmental, and cultural issues affecting them. These redesign processes are often supported by local communities who increasingly develop bottom-up initiatives to innovate and preserve the neighbourhood’s "common goods." This is certainly the case of Nolo, an area in the city of Milan (Italy) that has recently undergone an urban regeneration process thanks to the presence of a proactive community of actors living and working in the neighbourhood. Despite effective social innovation practices enacted by part of the local community, several "voices" in Nolo - mainly belonging to marginalized communities - are still excluded from the current process of urban regeneration. This lack of attention is rather problematic for the whole community, as it is leading to increasing rather than mitigating social polarization. To address this issue, we approached Nolo and its community through a participatory design experimentation, generating a series of collaborative platforms to enable those marginalized voices - humans as well as non-humans - to be heard, to enter into agonistic conversations with one another, and to question what they (should) all care about. What this (still ongoing) experimentation is currently showing is that to co-design collaborative platforms to counter polarization needs to be carefully balanced, negotiating between all the actors involved and acknowledging their thick entanglements to finally unravel how they radically inter-depend on one another. This kind of "ontologizing" practice is currently proving to be pivotal to counter “antagonisms” (and, therefore, mitigate social polarizations), and re-framing them in "agonistic" terms. This article reports how we operated this “ontologizing” practice in a particularly debated area of the neighbourhood by embracing the perspective of marginalized actors, encouraging them to collaborative and transformative actions for their own situated context.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otheragonism; marginalized communities; participatory design; radical interdependence; situated knowledges; social polarization; urban regenerationde
dc.titleDesigning Situated Vocabularies to Counter Social Polarizations: A Case Study of Nolo Neighbourhood, Milande
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6420/3198de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume8de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.classozSiedlungssoziologie, Stadtsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozSociology of Settlements and Housing, Urban Sociologyen
dc.subject.thesozMarginalitätde
dc.subject.thesozmarginalityen
dc.subject.thesozInterdependenzde
dc.subject.thesozinterdependenceen
dc.subject.thesozItaliende
dc.subject.thesozItalyen
dc.subject.thesozStadtteilde
dc.subject.thesozcity quarteren
dc.subject.thesozStadtentwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozurban developmenten
dc.subject.thesozStadterneuerungde
dc.subject.thesozurban renewalen
dc.subject.thesozPolarisierungde
dc.subject.thesozpolarizationen
dc.subject.thesozBürgerbeteiligungde
dc.subject.thesozcitizens' participationen
dc.subject.thesozRandgruppede
dc.subject.thesozfringe groupen
dc.subject.thesozNachbarschaftde
dc.subject.thesozneighborhooden
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037383
internal.identifier.thesoz10047710
internal.identifier.thesoz10048114
internal.identifier.thesoz10059032
internal.identifier.thesoz10042244
internal.identifier.thesoz10059059
internal.identifier.thesoz10063279
internal.identifier.thesoz10038842
internal.identifier.thesoz10046049
internal.identifier.thesoz10052841
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo322-334de
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.classoz10213
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.source.issuetopicPlanning Around Polarization: Learning With and From Controversy and Diversityde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6420de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6420
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record