Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHerrero-Olarte, Susanade
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Márquez, Angelade
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-21T08:42:13Z
dc.date.available2023-07-21T08:42:13Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/87828
dc.description.abstractCovid-19 has put all urban planning systems around the world to the test. Cities’ design and how these are managed are being observed, analyzed, and even questioned from the perspective of the pandemic. Density and poverty have been two fundamental aspects to manage in the pandemic scenario in cities of the Global South, which face this challenge along with other pre-pandemic planning problems. In the city of Quito, Ecuador, the response to the pandemic has been coordinated through regulations issued by the emergency operations center at the national level, and the information (number of cases) has been recorded per parish. The objective of this research is to determine if there is a relationship between Covid-19, poverty, and population density at the parish level for the canton of Quito. The results have shown that there is no correlation. What they did show is that due both to the difficulties of responding to the pandemic and the city’s planning structure, another type of characterization, or characterizations, of the territory (for example, by scenarios or by situations) is needed, which can respond to the needs of the most vulnerable groups. Another observable result was that the gap between urban planning and management instruments and the complexity of territorial needs contributes to the polarization of local government approaches, which compromises urban planning with minimum continuity and coherence.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.otherCovid-19; Quito; pandemic scenario; social determinantsde
dc.titleSocial Determinants, Urban Planning, and Covid-19 Response: Evidence From Quito, Ecuadorde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6189/3283de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume8de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.thesozEpidemiede
dc.subject.thesozepidemicen
dc.subject.thesozStadtplanungde
dc.subject.thesozurban planningen
dc.subject.thesozEcuadorde
dc.subject.thesozEcuadoren
dc.subject.thesozRechtsvorschriftde
dc.subject.thesozlegal provisionen
dc.subject.thesozGesundheitspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozhealth policyen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozsocial factorsen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10042424
internal.identifier.thesoz10035393
internal.identifier.thesoz10035559
internal.identifier.thesoz10056213
internal.identifier.thesoz10045550
internal.identifier.thesoz10045241
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo281-291de
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
dc.source.issuetopicPlanning Around Polarization: Learning With and From Controversy and Diversityde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i2.6189de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6189
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record