dc.contributor.author | Gheysen, Maarten | de |
dc.contributor.author | Leemans, Sophie | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-17T12:55:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-17T12:55:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2183-7635 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/87703 | |
dc.description.abstract | Dispersed territories such as Flanders (Belgium) have been amongst others described as layered territories, as a palimpsest landscape, or as both a selective and a-selective infill of the territory. In the constant re-editing and change of this territory, historical remnants remain visible and often form a departing point for further adaptations and changes. One of these remnants, the moated farmstead, has evolved from a historical (proto)type to a common typology in South-West Flanders and enabled inhabiting the territory dispersedly. Moated farmsteads are typically composed of a series of different buildings and are surrounded by an artificial water body. The moat formed the central point of a larger land management system. Nowadays, many of these farmsteads still exist, however, over time they lost their original purpose and transformed into a variety of uses. The design of a prototype, i.e., a first model later evolving into a type, a recurring model, as an architectural object can simultaneously relate to a larger theoretical reflection on the scale of the territory. Subsequently, these farmsteads lead to the question: What (proto)types have been developed to demonstrate the uniqueness of the relation between the land/labour/living in a dispersed territory? Can we re-interpret the moated farmstead as a new (proto)type to establish a more sustainable way of urbanising the countryside in a dispersed context? Therefore, this article first documents the historical figure of the moated farmstead as an architectural object, socio-economic and political organisation, and ecological land management, and documents its change throughout time. Then, a reflection is built on how, at the time of their emergence, these moated farmsteads were an exponent of a sustainable and ground-breaking type that enabled a dispersed settlement pattern. Finally, the potential of the farmstead as a new prototype for a twenty-first-century dispersed territory is discussed. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Städtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltung | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Landscaping and area planning | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Naturwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Science | en |
dc.subject.other | Flanders; architectural prototype; architectural typology; dispersed territories; moated farmstead; urban transformation | de |
dc.title | Change in the Dispersed Territory: (Proto)Types for a New Urban Paradigm | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5949/2980 | de |
dc.source.journal | Urban Planning | |
dc.source.volume | 8 | de |
dc.publisher.country | PRT | de |
dc.source.issue | 1 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Raumplanung und Regionalforschung | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Area Development Planning, Regional Research | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Naturwissenschaften, Technik(wissenschaften), angewandte Wissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Natural Science and Engineering, Applied Sciences | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Belgien | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Belgium | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Agrarbetrieb | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | farm | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Urbanisierung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | urbanization | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Architektur | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | architecture | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Siedlungsgebiet | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | settlement area | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Siedlungsstruktur | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | settlement pattern | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Landwirtschaft | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | agriculture | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038106 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034755 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10060932 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036714 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10057900 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10057895 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034547 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 5-18 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 20700 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 50200 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 794 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 710 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 500 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | Urban Heritage and Patterns of Change: Spatial Practices of Physical and Non-Physical Transformation | de |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.5949 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.dda.reference | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5949 | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |