dc.contributor.author | Sichinava, David | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-27T09:06:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-27T09:06:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1867-9323 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/87123 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article looks at how public opinion regarding the peace processes between Georgia and its two breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia have changed over the past few decades. Research has shown that Georgian citizens overwhelmingly oppose the idea of these breakaway regions obtaining sovereignty or becoming a part of neighboring Russia, in any form. Still, decades of frozen conflict have also caused many to concede that there is a need for new approaches to how Georgia can co-exist with its breakaway regions into the future. If certain political conditions are met, Georgians seem supportive of a quasi-federal solutions, or are at least open to compromise. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.other | Public Opinion; Conflict Resolution; Georgia | de |
dc.title | How Far is Too Far? Public Opinion on Conflict Resolution in Georgia | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Caucasus Analytical Digest | |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | de |
dc.source.issue | 116 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 3-8 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 2635 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000428141 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 20 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 10500 | de |
dc.subject.classhort | 11000 | de |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |