Show simple item record

[working paper]

dc.contributor.authorAcheampong, Martinde
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-25T05:50:05Z
dc.date.available2023-04-25T05:50:05Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn1862-3603de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/86464
dc.description.abstractAfrica reportedly exhibits lower overall levels of electoral integrity compared to other world regions. Remedying this situation has occasioned an explosion in the adoption of election technology. In 2023, Nigeria joined the wave of election digitalisation by holding its most technologically advanced polls since the inception of the Fourth Republic. But evidence from the elections contradicts the much-touted credibility guarantees that such technology comes with. Previous elections in Nigeria have witnessed a consistent decline in voter participation. Turnout in the just-ended 2023 presidential elections was a paltry 29 per cent, down from 69 per cent in 2003 and 53 per cent in 2011. Popular distrust in the electoral process generally, and in the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) particularly, has seen voter apathy in recent elections reach record levels. To salvage this situation, Nigeria has adopted digital technology to, among other things, enhance transparency and integrity in the electoral process and boost popular confidence in the INEC. Digital technology is expected to guarantee a credible electoral roll and bring some robustness to voter-accreditation processes, while simultaneously enabling public access to results in real time. However, the technology deployed in the 2023 elections proved to be insufficient in resolving these credibility deficits. Aside from the multiple technical challenges that bedevilled the technology in the course of these elections, voter turnout was the lowest in the history of the Fourth Republic and popular trust in the electoral process and the INEC does not seem salvageable in the short term. Ensuring that digital technologies guarantee credible elections in sub-Saharan Africa requires governments, democracy promoters, civil society groups, and international organisations prioritise election cybersecurity, build up local technical capacities, and focus on Election Management Bodies becoming more transparent, especially regarding the use of such technology.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherDemokratieförderung; Fortschritt; Misstrauen; Wahlbetrugde
dc.titleOverpromising and Underdelivering? Digital Technology in Nigeria's 2023 Presidential Electionsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume2de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.publisher.cityHamburgde
dc.source.seriesGIGA Focus Afrika
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozAfrikade
dc.subject.thesozAfricaen
dc.subject.thesozAfrika südlich der Saharade
dc.subject.thesozAfrica South of the Saharaen
dc.subject.thesozNigeriade
dc.subject.thesozNigeriaen
dc.subject.thesozWahlde
dc.subject.thesozelectionen
dc.subject.thesozPolitikde
dc.subject.thesozpoliticsen
dc.subject.thesozPräsidentde
dc.subject.thesozpresidenten
dc.subject.thesozStaatsoberhauptde
dc.subject.thesozhead of stateen
dc.subject.thesozPräsidentschaftswahlde
dc.subject.thesozpresidential electionen
dc.subject.thesozWahlbeteiligungde
dc.subject.thesozvoter turnouten
dc.subject.thesozDemokratiede
dc.subject.thesozdemocracyen
dc.subject.thesozDigitalisierungde
dc.subject.thesozdigitalizationen
dc.subject.thesozTechnologiede
dc.subject.thesoztechnologyen
dc.subject.thesoztechnischer Fortschrittde
dc.subject.thesoztechnological progressen
dc.subject.thesozBevölkerungde
dc.subject.thesozpopulationen
dc.subject.thesozZivilgesellschaftde
dc.subject.thesozcivil societyen
dc.subject.thesozTransparenzde
dc.subject.thesoztransparencyen
dc.subject.thesozIntegritätde
dc.subject.thesozintegrityen
dc.subject.thesozBetrugde
dc.subject.thesozfrauden
dc.subject.thesozPolitikverdrossenheitde
dc.subject.thesozdissatisfaction with politicsen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-86464-1
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Keine Bearbeitung 3.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGIGAde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10034677
internal.identifier.thesoz10034678
internal.identifier.thesoz10035654
internal.identifier.thesoz10034501
internal.identifier.thesoz10034827
internal.identifier.thesoz10040075
internal.identifier.thesoz10040076
internal.identifier.thesoz10061850
internal.identifier.thesoz10038845
internal.identifier.thesoz10037672
internal.identifier.thesoz10063943
internal.identifier.thesoz10035297
internal.identifier.thesoz10044004
internal.identifier.thesoz10034764
internal.identifier.thesoz10039889
internal.identifier.thesoz10066371
internal.identifier.thesoz10073508
internal.identifier.thesoz10039041
internal.identifier.thesoz10053247
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.source.pageinfo8de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorGerman Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Afrika-Studien
internal.identifier.corporateeditor1213
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.57671/gfaf-23022de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence27
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.identifier.series283
dc.subject.classhort10500de
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record