Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorDamme, Maike vande
dc.contributor.authorPavlopoulos, Dimitrisde
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-24T07:47:10Z
dc.date.available2023-04-24T07:47:10Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn1573-0921de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/86444
dc.description.abstractTwo recent articles (Grunow et al. in J Marriage Fam 80(1):42-60, 2018; Knight and Brinton in Am J Sociol 122(5):1485-1532) suggest that gender ideology is multidimensional. Such a finding is of utmost importance because, if robust, it can be used in future comparative (multilevel) research. However, these two articles present different results on which gender ideology profiles are dominant in Europe. Using the European Value Study, we replicate and extend these Latent Class analyses and address the question of generalizability and content- and criterion-related validity. We come to a five-cluster solution that not only synthesizes theoretically and empirically the results of the two articles, but also contributes to the literature by clarifying the place of these five gender ideology types in a multidimensional space. We suggest that in Europe five 'worlds of norms' exist that are mutually influenced by the general institutional context of welfare states.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.othergeneralizability; latent class analyses; multidimensional gender ideologies; replication; EVS 2008de
dc.titleGender Ideology in Europe: Plotting Normative Types in a Multidimensional Spacede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSocial Indicators Research
dc.source.volume164de
dc.publisher.countryNLDde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozFrauen- und Geschlechterforschungde
dc.subject.classozWomen's Studies, Feminist Studies, Gender Studiesen
dc.subject.thesozEVSde
dc.subject.thesozEVSen
dc.subject.thesozinternationaler Vergleichde
dc.subject.thesozinternational comparisonen
dc.subject.thesozValiditätde
dc.subject.thesozvalidityen
dc.subject.thesozgeschlechtsspezifische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozgender-specific factorsen
dc.subject.thesozIdeologiede
dc.subject.thesozideologyen
dc.subject.thesozGeschlechtde
dc.subject.thesozgenderen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-86444-1
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10079761
internal.identifier.thesoz10047775
internal.identifier.thesoz10049626
internal.identifier.thesoz10045237
internal.identifier.thesoz10039894
internal.identifier.thesoz10045224
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo861-891de
internal.identifier.classoz20200
internal.identifier.journal281
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02976-9de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record