Show simple item record

[working paper]

dc.contributor.authorSharma, Chanchal Kumarde
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-19T06:18:17Z
dc.date.available2023-04-19T06:18:17Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn1862-359Xde
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/86336
dc.description.abstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the significance of empowering local authorities to respond to health emergencies. This policy brief, drawing on a comparative analysis of four Indian states, shows that a successful pandemic response depends on factors such as local governance, community engagement, and decisive leadership. As India's federal system has demonstrated, an undue centralisation of authority combined with a decentralisation of responsibility without adequate resources can undermine the efficacy of a crisis response. Political polarisation can be a formidable obstacle, obstructing coordination and exacerbating the inefficiency of crisis response. Kerala's and Odisha's crisis management during the COVID-19 pandemic has been commendable, with dedicated leadership, coordinated efforts between the respective state and local administrations, and active public engagement contributing to their success. Despite having a weaker healthcare system, Odisha's response to the crisis was comparable to Kerala's, while Uttar Pradesh's was hindered by uncommitted leadership and polarisation along political and communal lines. Karnataka, with a stronger healthcare infrastructure than Odisha and Uttar Pradesh, performed only marginally better than Uttar Pradesh, primarily due to a lack of committed leadership, cooperation, and trust across government agencies. Decision-makers in federal systems worldwide, and in the European Union in particular, can benefit from studying India's COVID-19 response. To achieve a successful response, policymakers should prioritise horizontal and vertical coordination and encourage subnational innovation. India's state-level experiences suggest the importance of leveraging networks between different levels of government and civil society. Key factors for success include strong infrastructure, committed leadership, collaboration across government departments, empowerment of grassroots initiatives, and active community engagement.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherKommunen; Covid-19; Pandemie; Seuchenbekämpfung; Governance; Gesundheitshilfede
dc.titleFederalism in Times of Crisis: Insights from India's COVID-19 Responsede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume3de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.publisher.cityHamburgde
dc.source.seriesGIGA Focus Asien
dc.subject.classozGesundheitspolitikde
dc.subject.classozHealth Policyen
dc.subject.thesozAsiende
dc.subject.thesozAsiaen
dc.subject.thesozSüdasiende
dc.subject.thesozSouth Asiaen
dc.subject.thesozIndiende
dc.subject.thesozIndiaen
dc.subject.thesozStaatde
dc.subject.thesoznational stateen
dc.subject.thesozRegionde
dc.subject.thesozregionen
dc.subject.thesozGesellschaftde
dc.subject.thesozsocietyen
dc.subject.thesozSozialpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozsocial policyen
dc.subject.thesozGesundheitde
dc.subject.thesozhealthen
dc.subject.thesozMedizinde
dc.subject.thesozmedicineen
dc.subject.thesozEpidemiede
dc.subject.thesozepidemicen
dc.subject.thesozKrankheitde
dc.subject.thesozillnessen
dc.subject.thesozKrisenmanagementde
dc.subject.thesozcrisis management (econ., pol.)en
dc.subject.thesozKommunalpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozlocal politicsen
dc.subject.thesozKommunalverwaltungde
dc.subject.thesozmunicipal administrationen
dc.subject.thesozRegierungde
dc.subject.thesozgovernmenten
dc.subject.thesozPolarisierungde
dc.subject.thesozpolarizationen
dc.subject.thesozFöderalismusde
dc.subject.thesozfederalismen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-86336-1
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Keine Bearbeitung 3.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGIGAde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10036843
internal.identifier.thesoz10034674
internal.identifier.thesoz10042315
internal.identifier.thesoz10039642
internal.identifier.thesoz10044625
internal.identifier.thesoz10034805
internal.identifier.thesoz10036537
internal.identifier.thesoz10045492
internal.identifier.thesoz10035115
internal.identifier.thesoz10042424
internal.identifier.thesoz10035075
internal.identifier.thesoz10050112
internal.identifier.thesoz10044911
internal.identifier.thesoz10045510
internal.identifier.thesoz10040090
internal.identifier.thesoz10063279
internal.identifier.thesoz10040121
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.source.pageinfo13de
internal.identifier.classoz11006
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorGerman Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Asien-Studien
internal.identifier.corporateeditor1214
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.57671/gfas-23032de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence27
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.identifier.series284
dc.subject.classhort10500de
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record