Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorPetrescu, Doinade
dc.contributor.authorCermeño, Helenade
dc.contributor.authorKeller, Carstende
dc.contributor.authorMoujan, Carolade
dc.contributor.authorBelfield, Andrewde
dc.contributor.authorKoch, Floriande
dc.contributor.authorGoff, Denisede
dc.contributor.authorSchalk, Meikede
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, Florisde
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-18T14:22:15Z
dc.date.available2023-04-18T14:22:15Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/86311
dc.description.abstractWhile the growing commodification of housing and public spaces in European cities is producing urban inequalities affecting mostly migrant and vulnerable populations, there are also manifold small-scale neighbourhood-based collaborative processes that seek to co-produce shared urban resources and contribute to more resilient urban developments. As part of the ProSHARE research project that investigates conditions in which sharing takes place and can be expanded to less-represented populations, we focus here on sharing and space-commoning practices within urban living labs. Considered multi-stakeholders sites for innovation, testing, and learning with a strong urban transformative potential, urban living labs have received increasing academic attention in recent years. However, questions related to whether and how labs facilitate processes of exchange and negotiation of knowledge claims and generate spatial knowledge remain largely unexplored. We address this gap by looking at the role urban living labs play in the regeneration of neighbourhoods, asking how sharing and space-commoning practices generate situated spatial knowledge(s) that can be used in planning processes, and what type of settings and methods can facilitate such processes. These questions are addressed in the context of four ProSHARE-Labs located in Berlin, Paris (Bagneux), London, and Vienna, drawing on a cross-case analysis of the functioning of these hubs, the research methods applied in each context, and on the translocal learning and possibilities for upscaling resulting from these parallel experiences.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.otherProSHARE; R-Urban; heterogeneous neighbourhoods; situated knowledges; spatial knowledge; translocal learning; urban commons; urban living labde
dc.titleSharing and Space-Commoning Knowledge Through Urban Living Labs Across Different European Citiesde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5402de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume7de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo254-273de
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
dc.source.issuetopicSpatial Knowledge and Urban Planningde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5402de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5402
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record