Show simple item record

[working paper]

dc.contributor.authorSchüller, Margotde
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-17T08:15:08Z
dc.date.available2023-02-17T08:15:08Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn1862-359Xde
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/85232
dc.description.abstractIn contrast to the United States' unilateral China policy under President Donald Trump, the Joe Biden administration has renewed its ties with European and Asian allies. In its struggle with China for supremacy, the US strives to build a "united front" based on similar values. Although European countries share many values with the US, the China policies of the European Union and some of its member states substantially differ, not least due to diverging threat perceptions and economic interests. Against all expectations, the Biden administration continued Trump's policy of containing China's development through tariffs, exports controls, investment blockades, and visa restrictions. With the US CHIPS and Science Act and new export controls, the US government seeks to slow down China's further technological rise. Security issues have become more important in both the US and EU approach. European countries are, however, still reluctant to apply the same threat assessment for China as for Russia and to disengage from China. Europe's dependency on China as a key market and production base is still high, and most EU member states are not yet prepared for an economic decoupling. Although governments and research institutes in Europe have become more aware of the risks of science and technology cooperation with China, to discontinue it is not seen as an option. Despite the US and EU attempting to coordinate their China policies, the new US export controls on semiconductors were criticised by many European companies as unilateral decisions. The US and EU struggle to align their diverging interests on important topics such as the use of subsidies to support their economies. Therefore, the chances of them developing a unified China policy remain limited. The relationship between the US and China has turned into a new Cold War in which the coexistence of different economic and political systems does not seem possible. For European countries, decoupling from China would undermine economic stability. Instead, the EU should further cooperate with China following an interest-led policy based on the principles of openness and rules-based multilateralism.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.titleDisengagement from China: United States and European Union Policies Comparedde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume1de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.publisher.cityHamburgde
dc.source.seriesGIGA Focus Asien
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozUSAde
dc.subject.thesozUnited States of Americaen
dc.subject.thesozEUde
dc.subject.thesozEUen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.thesozinternational relationsen
dc.subject.thesozAußenpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozforeign policyen
dc.subject.thesozSicherheitspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozsecurity policyen
dc.subject.thesozwirtschaftliche Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozeconomic factorsen
dc.subject.thesozBedrohungde
dc.subject.thesozthreaten
dc.subject.thesozinternationaler Wettbewerbde
dc.subject.thesozinternational competitionen
dc.subject.thesozAußenwirtschaftspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozinternational trade policyen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Zusammenarbeitde
dc.subject.thesozinternational cooperationen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-85232-2
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Keine Bearbeitung 3.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGIGAde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10041244
internal.identifier.thesoz10041441
internal.identifier.thesoz10037331
internal.identifier.thesoz10034694
internal.identifier.thesoz10037376
internal.identifier.thesoz10039014
internal.identifier.thesoz10037879
internal.identifier.thesoz10047903
internal.identifier.thesoz10037353
internal.identifier.thesoz10037395
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.source.pageinfo10de
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorGerman Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Asien-Studien
internal.identifier.corporateeditor1214
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.57671/gfas-23012de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence27
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.identifier.series284
dc.subject.classhort10500de
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record