Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHeyder, Aribertde
dc.contributor.authorAnstötz, Pascalde
dc.contributor.authorEisentraut, Marcusde
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Peterde
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-08T13:39:59Z
dc.date.available2023-02-08T13:39:59Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn2673-3145de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/85102
dc.description.abstractConceptually, "group-focused enmity" (GFE, long-term project in Germany, duration: 2002-2011) consists of several different attitudes that constitute a syndrome of group-focused enmity. These attitudes are empirically related to each other and share a common core which is the ideology of inequality. But is GFE really a one-dimensional homogeneous ideology? Over the years there have been considerable doubts about this fundamental assumption. We have two central theoretical argumentations for explicating and revising the concept of GFE. The first is based on the social psychological literature regarding differences between ideologies, attitudes, stereotypes and social prejudices. The second arises from one of the basic conceptual ideas of the GFE project, which states that depending on the respective societies different specific groups become targets of devaluation and discrimination. Therefore, we propose a revised version of the GFE syndrome as a two-dimensional concept: an ideology of inequality (generalized attitudes) and social prejudice (specific attitudes). The measurement models are strictly empirically tested using data from the GFE panel (waves 2006, 2008) as well as the representative GFE-surveys (cross-sections 2003, 2011) conducted in Germany. To test for discriminant and external validity, we have also included social dominance orientation (SDO). Additionally, within this framework, the methodological focus of the study is to test for several forms of measurement invariance in the context of higher-order factor models considering the issue of multidimensionality of latent variables. Our empirical results support the idea that GFE is a bi-dimensional concept consisting of an ideology of inequality and social prejudice. Moreover, SDO is demonstrated to be empirically distinct from both dimensions and correlates more strongly with the ideology of inequality in comparison to social prejudice. Additionally, the bi-dimensional GFE conceptualization proves to be at least metric invariant both between and within individuals. The impact of our proposed conceptualization and empirical findings will be discussed in the context of international research on ideologies, attitudes and prejudices. The dealing questions are why different explanatory factors have different effects on prejudicial and ideological attitudes and why there are different forms and manifestations of social prejudice in different societies over time.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPsychologiede
dc.subject.ddcPsychologyen
dc.subject.othergroup-focused enmity (GFE); higher-order confirmatory factor analysis; measurement invariance; social dominance orientation (SDO)de
dc.title"20 Years After…" GFE 2.0: A Theoretical Revision and Empirical Testing of the Concept of "Group-Focused Enmity" Based on Longitudinal Datade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urllocalfile:/var/tmp/crawlerFiles/deepGreen/051ce4e66d064fd0af6a1b876e757095/051ce4e66d064fd0af6a1b876e757095.pdfde
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Political Science
dc.source.volume4de
dc.publisher.countryCHEde
dc.subject.classozSozialpsychologiede
dc.subject.classozSocial Psychologyen
dc.subject.thesozEinstellungde
dc.subject.thesozattitudeen
dc.subject.thesozStereotypde
dc.subject.thesozstereotypeen
dc.subject.thesozVorurteilde
dc.subject.thesozprejudiceen
dc.subject.thesozIdeologiede
dc.subject.thesozideologyen
dc.subject.thesozDominanzde
dc.subject.thesozdominanceen
dc.subject.thesozDiskriminierungde
dc.subject.thesozdiscriminationen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-85102-2
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10036125
internal.identifier.thesoz10041741
internal.identifier.thesoz10041740
internal.identifier.thesoz10039894
internal.identifier.thesoz10041250
internal.identifier.thesoz10038125
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10706
internal.identifier.journal1910
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc150
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.752810de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.dda.referencecrawler-deepgreen-188@@051ce4e66d064fd0af6a1b876e757095


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record