Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorForke, Annade
dc.contributor.authorSiegers, Pascalde
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-08T09:46:10Z
dc.date.available2023-02-08T09:46:10Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn2673-3145de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/85090
dc.description.abstractMedical treatments at the beginning and end of human life are highly contested in public discourse. Our study reveals factors shaping the acceptance of social egg freezing (or oocyte cryopreservation) as an assisted reproduction technology (ART) in the general public. Based on the theory of moral contextualism and the literature on medical ethics, we deduce potential factors influencing attitudes toward cryopreservation (for example, the number of oocytes used or the age up to which women plan to use the oocytes). The influence of these factors on individual attitudes is modeled using a factorial design embedded into a web survey. The results show that factors associated with potential harm to the children decrease acceptance of cryopreservation, whereas factors associated with potential harm to the women increase acceptance. The strongest effect has the age at which women plan to use the preserved oocytes.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.otherassisted reproduction (ART); factorial survey; moral contextualism; oocyte cryopreservationde
dc.titleMore benefit or harm? Moral contextualism shapes public attitudes towards social egg freezingde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urllocalfile:/var/tmp/crawlerFiles/deepGreen/e00f6ac731b740dab83e8feff6fe14f1/e00f6ac731b740dab83e8feff6fe14f1.pdfde
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Political Science
dc.source.volume4de
dc.publisher.countryCHEde
dc.subject.classozMedizinsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozMedical Sociologyen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozReproduktionsmedizinde
dc.subject.thesozmedical ethicsen
dc.subject.thesozmoralityen
dc.subject.thesozreproductive medicineen
dc.subject.thesozöffentliche Meinungde
dc.subject.thesozEinstellungsbildungde
dc.subject.thesozMoralde
dc.subject.thesozMedizinethikde
dc.subject.thesozattitude formationen
dc.subject.thesozpublic opinionen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-85090-9
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10042805
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10041589
internal.identifier.thesoz10052047
internal.identifier.thesoz10086259
internal.identifier.thesoz10051955
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
internal.identifier.classoz10215
internal.identifier.journal1910
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.995009de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.dda.referencecrawler-deepgreen-188@@e00f6ac731b740dab83e8feff6fe14f1
ssoar.licence.fundWGL-Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record