Show simple item record

[working paper]

dc.contributor.authorKenkel, Kai Michaelde
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-15T07:27:33Z
dc.date.available2022-12-15T07:27:33Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn1862-3573de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/83452
dc.description.abstractLuiz Inácio Lula da Silva (known broadly as "Lula") has defeated incumbent Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil's presidential election. As the Global South giant emerges from the isolation and loss of influence imposed by Bolsonaro's right-wing anti-globalist agenda, how can Germany and Europe best engage it with a view to resuming a key strategic partnership? Brazil's relations with the EU and Germany are at a historical postwar low. Normative differences with a Bolsonaro government driven by extreme right-wing domestic constituencies have stalled trade and climate negotiations, led to clashes on human rights and deforestation, and caused what were once regular high-level contacts to ebb to a trickle. The election itself was decided by a razor-thin margin and marred by voter suppression, contestations of its legitimacy, and pervasive electoral violations by Bolsonaro. The incumbent has not formally conceded, and his supporters were still in the streets a week after the vote. Assistance in asserting the functioning of the country's democratic institutions is urgently needed. Lula will realign the country with its multilateral diplomatic traditions and seek to reinstate social policies cancelled by Bolsonaro, such as poverty reduction, human rights, and safeguards for minorities, as well as environmental protection and sustainable development. This will align Brazil increasingly with Europe. But today's scenario is different from Lula's first two terms in office between 2003 and 2011: the National Congress is hostile to Lula's agenda, there is no commodity boom, and a polarised and unequal international system has less room for the rise of an emerging power. Germany and Europe should actively and regularly engage Brazil and assist in its moves to consolidate its democracy, combat inequality, protect the rainforest and safeguard minority rights. To do so, it should use trade policy as an incentive, reinforce civilian control over the armed forces, engage subnational partners, and assist in combatting fake news.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.titleBack from the Depths: Brazil, the World and the EU after Lula's Electoral Victoryde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume5de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.publisher.cityHamburgde
dc.source.seriesGIGA Focus Lateinamerika
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.thesozLateinamerikade
dc.subject.thesozLatin Americaen
dc.subject.thesozSüdamerikade
dc.subject.thesozSouth Americaen
dc.subject.thesozBrasiliende
dc.subject.thesozBrazilen
dc.subject.thesozStaatde
dc.subject.thesoznational stateen
dc.subject.thesozpolitisches Systemde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical systemen
dc.subject.thesozVerfassungde
dc.subject.thesozconstitutionen
dc.subject.thesozpolitischer Wandelde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical changeen
dc.subject.thesozSystemveränderungde
dc.subject.thesozsystem changeen
dc.subject.thesozDemokratisierungde
dc.subject.thesozdemocratizationen
dc.subject.thesozEuropade
dc.subject.thesozEuropeen
dc.subject.thesozAbstimmungde
dc.subject.thesozvotingen
dc.subject.thesozWahlde
dc.subject.thesozelectionen
dc.subject.thesozDemokratiede
dc.subject.thesozdemocracyen
dc.subject.thesozAußenpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozforeign policyen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Politikde
dc.subject.thesozinternational politicsen
dc.subject.thesozWirtschaftsbeziehungende
dc.subject.thesozeconomic relationsen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.thesozinternational relationsen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungende
dc.subject.thesozinternational economic relationsen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-83452-2
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Keine Bearbeitung 3.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGIGAde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035406
internal.identifier.thesoz10035556
internal.identifier.thesoz10039751
internal.identifier.thesoz10039642
internal.identifier.thesoz10040669
internal.identifier.thesoz10046005
internal.identifier.thesoz10054942
internal.identifier.thesoz10034624
internal.identifier.thesoz10040703
internal.identifier.thesoz10042879
internal.identifier.thesoz10034500
internal.identifier.thesoz10034501
internal.identifier.thesoz10037672
internal.identifier.thesoz10034694
internal.identifier.thesoz10037372
internal.identifier.thesoz10046249
internal.identifier.thesoz10037331
internal.identifier.thesoz10037393
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.source.pageinfo8de
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorGerman Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA) - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Lateinamerika-Studien
internal.identifier.corporateeditor1215
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.57671/gfla-22052de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence27
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.identifier.series287
dc.subject.classhort10500de
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record