Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorWatson, Dorothyde
dc.contributor.authorGrotti, Raffaelede
dc.contributor.authorWhelan, Christopher T.de
dc.contributor.authorMaître, Bertrandde
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-16T07:49:01Z
dc.date.available2022-11-16T07:49:01Z
dc.date.issued2021de
dc.identifier.issn1469-7823de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/83059
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates changes over the period 2005 to 2014 in material deprivation dynamics of social risk groups in 11 European countries covering a range of welfare regimes. The period covered experienced dramatic economic change, encompassing periods of boom, the Great Recession and early recovery. Social risk groups are defined as groups which differ in the challenges that they face in converting resources into desired outcomes. The comparative element of the paper allows us to assess whether certain welfare regimes were better at protecting more vulnerable groups. Results, based on the longitudinal component of the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions and on analysis of deprivation dynamics between pairs of years, showed large inequality between groups in the risk of persistent deprivation - with lone parents and people with disability most at risk in all countries. Variation across welfare regimes was restricted to the contrast between the liberal and the remaining regimes. Countries belonging to the former regime (UK and Ireland) were distinctive in showing the largest social risk gap in persistent deprivation and were the only ones which experienced substantial polarisation between groups with the Great Recession.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSoziale Probleme und Sozialdienstede
dc.subject.ddcSocial problems and servicesen
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.otherEU-SILC 2005-2014 ; EU-LFS 2005-2014; deprivation dynamics; social risk groups; comparative welfare regimesde
dc.titleWelfare Regime Variation in the Impact of the Great Recession on Deprivation Levels: A Dynamic Perspective on Polarisation vs Convergence for Social Risk Groups, 2005-2014de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Social Policy
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issueFirst Viewde
dc.subject.classozsoziale Problemede
dc.subject.classozSocial Problemsen
dc.subject.classozVolkswirtschaftstheoriede
dc.subject.classozNational Economyen
dc.subject.thesozGreat Depressionen
dc.subject.thesozDeprivationde
dc.subject.thesozWeltwirtschaftskrisede
dc.subject.thesozBenachteiligungde
dc.subject.thesozrecessionen
dc.subject.thesozwelfare stateen
dc.subject.thesozArmutde
dc.subject.thesozdeprivationen
dc.subject.thesozpovertyen
dc.subject.thesozRezessionde
dc.subject.thesozWohlfahrtsstaatde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-83059-4
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10036765
internal.identifier.thesoz10050097
internal.identifier.thesoz10049572
internal.identifier.thesoz10038123
internal.identifier.thesoz10040753
internal.identifier.thesoz10058491
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-21de
internal.identifier.classoz20500
internal.identifier.classoz1090301
internal.identifier.journal1411
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc360
internal.identifier.ddc330
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279421000210de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record