Show simple item record

[comment]

dc.contributor.authorMinzarari, Dumitrude
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T13:50:24Z
dc.date.available2022-10-11T13:50:24Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn2747-5107de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/81666
dc.description.abstractThe euphoria felt by both domestic and foreign liberal audiences following the vic­tory of a pro-reform party in Moldova is now receding. The new Moldovan leadership has stumbled in fulfilling its main electoral promise, namely to fight corruption by effectively reforming the justice system. There is a growing realisation that justice reform initiated and conducted with Western support over the last decade, and based on the implementation of existing best practices, might not be the most effec­tive approach considering Moldova's conditions. With corrupt courts and a public pros­ecutor office that is still connected to former kleptocrats, Moldova is a model weak state. A more suitable approach to justice reform would be to first establish pre­requisites that would lead to the impartiality of the legal system before granting it politi­cal independence. This may also prove a more suitable model of justice reform for other Eastern Partnership countries undermined by strongmen and tycoons. (author's abstract)de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcRechtde
dc.subject.ddcLawen
dc.subject.otherMoldau; Innenpolitische Lage/Entwicklung; Politische Reformen; Justiz/Judikative Gewalt; Justizreform; Korruptionsbekämpfung; Rechtsstaatlichkeit/Rechtsstaat; Entwicklungsperspektive und -tendenz; Sandu‏, Maia; Reformpolitik; Ernennung, Umbesetzung oder Entlassung von Personen; Richter; Korruption; Wahl/Abstimmung; Parlament; Politische Partei; Parteiprogramm; Kleptokratie; Korruptionswahrnehmungde
dc.titleJustice reform as the battleground for genuine democratic transformation in Moldova: insights for the Eastern Partnershipde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume27/2022de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.publisher.cityBerlinde
dc.source.seriesSWP Comment
dc.subject.classozJustizde
dc.subject.classozJudiciaryen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-81666-7
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
ssoar.contributor.institutionSWPde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentStellungnahmede
dc.type.documentcommenten
dc.source.pageinfo8de
internal.identifier.classoz40102
internal.identifier.document27
dc.contributor.corporateeditorStiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit
internal.identifier.corporateeditor292
internal.identifier.ddc340
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18449/2022C27de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.identifier.series756
dc.subject.classhort10500de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record