dc.contributor.author | Kunz, Tanja | de |
dc.contributor.author | Meitinger, Katharina | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-30T14:46:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-30T14:46:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1552-3969 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/81568 | |
dc.description.abstract | Although list-style open-ended questions generally help us gain deeper insights into respondents’ thoughts, opinions, and behaviors, the quality of responses is often compromised. We tested a dynamic and a follow-up design to motivate respondents to give higher quality responses than with a static design, but without overburdening them. Our results showed that a follow-up design achieved longer responses with more themes and theme areas than a static design. In contrast, the dynamic design produced the shortest answers with the fewest themes and theme areas. No differences in item nonresponse and only minor differences in additional response burden were found among the three list-style designs. Our study shows that design features and timing are crucial to clarify the desired response format and motivate respondents to give high-quality answers to list-style open-ended questions. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.title | A Comparison of Three Designs for List-style Open-ended Questions in Web Surveys | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Field Methods | |
dc.publisher.country | USA | de |
dc.source.issue | OnlineFirst | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | quality | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Antwortverhalten | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Datengewinnung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | online survey | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | survey | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Online-Befragung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Befragung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | data collection method | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | comparison | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Qualität | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | questionnaire | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | response behavior | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | survey research | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | data capture | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Umfrageforschung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Fragebogen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Vergleich | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Erhebungsmethode | de |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-81568-2 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
ssoar.contributor.institution | GESIS | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040714 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040547 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10047774 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035808 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037327 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037910 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037911 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037914 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037921 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 1-15 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10105 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 1363 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X221115831 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 10100 | de |
ssoar.wgl.collection | true | de |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |
ssoar.licence.fund | Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Projektnummer 491156185 / Funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) - Project number 491156185 | |