Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKunz, Tanjade
dc.contributor.authorMeitinger, Katharinade
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-30T14:46:16Z
dc.date.available2022-09-30T14:46:16Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn1552-3969de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/81568
dc.description.abstractAlthough list-style open-ended questions generally help us gain deeper insights into respondents’ thoughts, opinions, and behaviors, the quality of responses is often compromised. We tested a dynamic and a follow-up design to motivate respondents to give higher quality responses than with a static design, but without overburdening them. Our results showed that a follow-up design achieved longer responses with more themes and theme areas than a static design. In contrast, the dynamic design produced the shortest answers with the fewest themes and theme areas. No differences in item nonresponse and only minor differences in additional response burden were found among the three list-style designs. Our study shows that design features and timing are crucial to clarify the desired response format and motivate respondents to give high-quality answers to list-style open-ended questions.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.titleA Comparison of Three Designs for List-style Open-ended Questions in Web Surveysde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalField Methods
dc.publisher.countryUSAde
dc.source.issueOnlineFirstde
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozqualityen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozdata collection methoden
dc.subject.thesozcomparisonen
dc.subject.thesozQualitätde
dc.subject.thesozquestionnaireen
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozFragebogende
dc.subject.thesozVergleichde
dc.subject.thesozErhebungsmethodede
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-81568-2
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10047774
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10037327
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
internal.identifier.thesoz10037914
internal.identifier.thesoz10037921
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo1-15de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal1363
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X221115831de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort10100de
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.licence.fundGefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Projektnummer 491156185 / Funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) - Project number 491156185


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record