Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorMakhortykh, Mykolade
dc.contributor.authorUrman, Aleksandrade
dc.contributor.authorGil-Lopez, Teresade
dc.contributor.authorUlloa, Robertode
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T11:00:56Z
dc.date.available2022-09-27T11:00:56Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn1066-2243de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/81471
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study investigates perceptions of the use of online tracking, a passive data collection method relying on the automated recording of participant actions on desktop and mobile devices, for studying information behavior. It scrutinizes folk theories of tracking, the concerns tracking raises among the potential participants and design mechanisms that can be used to alleviate these concerns. Design/methodology/approach: This study uses focus groups composed of university students (n = 13) to conduct an in-depth investigation of tracking perceptions in the context of information behavior research. Each focus group addresses three thematic blocks: (1) views on online tracking as a research technique, (2) concerns that influence participants' willingness to be tracked and (3) design mechanisms via which tracking-related concerns can be alleviated. To facilitate the discussion, each focus group combines open questions with card-sorting tasks. The results are analyzed using a combination of deductive content analysis and constant comparison analysis, with the main coding categories corresponding to the thematic blocks listed above. Findings: The study finds that perceptions of tracking are influenced by recent data-related scandals (e.g. Cambridge Analytica), which have amplified negative attitudes toward tracking, which is viewed as a surveillance tool used by corporations and governments. This study also confirms the contextual nature of tracking-related concerns, which vary depending on the activities and content that are tracked. In terms of mechanisms used to address these concerns, this study highlights the importance of transparency-based mechanisms, particularly explanations dealing with the aims and methods of data collection, followed by privacy- and control-based mechanisms. Originality/value: The study conducts a detailed examination of tracking perceptions and discusses how this research method can be used to increase engagement and empower participants involved in information behavior research.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otherInformation behavior; Tracking; User-centered design; Focus groups; Folk theoriesde
dc.titleTo track or not to track: examining perceptions of online tracking for information behavior researchde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternet Research
dc.source.volume32de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue7de
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.classozInformationswissenschaftde
dc.subject.classozInformation Scienceen
dc.subject.classozinteraktive, elektronische Mediende
dc.subject.classozInteractive, electronic Mediaen
dc.subject.thesozInformationsverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozinformation-seeking behavioren
dc.subject.thesozDatengewinnungde
dc.subject.thesozdata captureen
dc.subject.thesozWahrnehmungde
dc.subject.thesozperceptionen
dc.subject.thesozErhebungsmethodede
dc.subject.thesozdata collection methoden
dc.subject.thesozInhaltsanalysede
dc.subject.thesozcontent analysisen
dc.subject.thesozVergleichde
dc.subject.thesozcomparisonen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-81471-7
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10047433
internal.identifier.thesoz10040547
internal.identifier.thesoz10040719
internal.identifier.thesoz10037921
internal.identifier.thesoz10035488
internal.identifier.thesoz10047774
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo260-279de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.classoz1080500
internal.identifier.classoz1080404
internal.identifier.journal2430
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-01-2021-0074de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort10100de
dc.subject.classhort10800de
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record