Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorErdoğan, Müşerrefde
dc.contributor.authorAbbasoğlu Özgören, Ayşede
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-25T06:58:37Z
dc.date.available2022-08-25T06:58:37Z
dc.date.issued2022de
dc.identifier.issn1869-8999de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/81119
dc.description.abstractAdaptation to host country behaviours encompasses both individual and social change, bringing about rising diversity issues in the host society and societal shifts in the country of origin. This study aims to detect whether Turkish immigrants and their descendants converge towards or diverge from the partnership practices of the native-born population in Western Germany. Specifically, transitions from (1) singlehood to the first partnership, (2) singlehood to the first marriage, (3) singlehood to the first cohabitation, (4) cohabitation to marriage and (5) marriage to divorce are investigated. Data from the Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam) survey for the period of 2008-2018 are used, applying Kaplan-Meier survival estimations and Cox proportional hazard models. This is the first study that includes natives, immigrants and their descendants simultaneously in an analysis of extensive partnership transitions covering practices of cohabitation, marriage and divorce and to investigate the proportionality assumption in Cox models. We formulate four research hypotheses based on the hypotheses of socialisation, adaptation and the cultural maintenance and segmented assimilation theory. Supporting our first hypothesis, our findings indicate a difference in partnership patterns between both first- and second-generation immigrants and natives, except for the finding that second-generation immigrants resemble the native pattern in their transition to the first union (including both cohabitation and marriage). Immigrants and their descendants tend to marry directly and have lower divorce hazard ratios than their native counterparts, while consensual unions are uncommon among Turkish immigrants. As suggested by our second hypothesis, the extent of the divergence varies across partnership transitions. Finally, our results provide support for our third hypothesis rather than the fourth in that partnership transition of Turkish immigrants' descendants more closely resembles that of first-generation immigrants compared to natives.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherUnion formation; Divorce; Turkish Immigrants; Event History Analysis; Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam) survey, 2008-2018de
dc.titlePartnership Transitions among Turkish Immigrants and their Descendants in Western Germanyde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalComparative Population Studies - Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft
dc.source.volume47de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.subject.classozBevölkerungde
dc.subject.classozPopulation Studies, Sociology of Populationen
dc.subject.classozMigrationde
dc.subject.classozMigration, Sociology of Migrationen
dc.subject.thesozTürkeide
dc.subject.thesozTurkeyen
dc.subject.thesozMigrationde
dc.subject.thesozmigrationen
dc.subject.thesozZuwanderungde
dc.subject.thesozimmigrationen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozalte Bundesländerde
dc.subject.thesozold federal statesen
dc.subject.thesozAssimilationde
dc.subject.thesozassimilationen
dc.subject.thesozzweite Generationde
dc.subject.thesozsecond generationen
dc.subject.thesozPartnerschaftde
dc.subject.thesozpartnershipen
dc.subject.thesozFamiliengründungde
dc.subject.thesozfamily formationen
dc.subject.thesozEhede
dc.subject.thesozmarriageen
dc.subject.thesozLebensgemeinschaftde
dc.subject.thesozcohabitationen
dc.subject.thesozEhescheidungde
dc.subject.thesozdivorceen
dc.subject.thesozAlleinstehenderde
dc.subject.thesozsingleen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Anpassungde
dc.subject.thesozsocial adjustmenten
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10036847
internal.identifier.thesoz10034515
internal.identifier.thesoz10034517
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10040106
internal.identifier.thesoz10036851
internal.identifier.thesoz10052237
internal.identifier.thesoz10044348
internal.identifier.thesoz10064247
internal.identifier.thesoz10041471
internal.identifier.thesoz10041472
internal.identifier.thesoz10041503
internal.identifier.thesoz10035068
internal.identifier.thesoz10035716
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo321-348de
internal.identifier.classoz10303
internal.identifier.classoz10304
internal.identifier.journal60
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2022-13de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence24
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record