Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKöpke, Sörende
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-12T07:08:14Z
dc.date.available2022-08-12T07:08:14Z
dc.date.issued2019de
dc.identifier.issn2566-6878de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/80820
dc.description.abstractDespite the Chinese Communist Party's claim to inter-ethnic harmony, the human rights situation of some of the PRC's 55 official minorities is problematic. The article discusses minority unrest in relation to the ongoing transformation of the country's Inner Asian frontier regions. Taking the three autonomous regions of Tibet, Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia as case studies, it examines the long-running but recently accelerated processes of modernisation and ethno-political conflict. It argues that minority policy is driven by nationalist / neo-developmentalist motives aimed at both the expansion and intensification of Chinese power, and that this process can be termed state-led territorialisation. Programmes such as the Great Western Development and the Belt and Road Initiative are viewed through the lens of neo-developmentalist territorialisation, which is aimed at entrenching the Communist Party's control of China's frontier regions. This perspective provides explanations for conflict that cover several dimensions, from political, economic and cultural causes to ethno-political strife.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.otherNeo-developmentalism; minorities; ethnic conflict; territorialisation; China; Tibet; Xinjiang; Inner Mongoliade
dc.titleTerritorialising Chinese Inner Asia: The Neo-Developmentalist State and Minority Unrestde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://hasp.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/iqas/article/view/10343de
dc.source.journalInternational Quarterly for Asian Studies (IQAS)
dc.source.volume50de
dc.publisher.countryDEUde
dc.source.issue1-2de
dc.subject.classozEthnologie, Kulturanthropologie, Ethnosoziologiede
dc.subject.classozEthnology, Cultural Anthropology, Ethnosociologyen
dc.subject.classozMigrationde
dc.subject.classozMigration, Sociology of Migrationen
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo137-156de
internal.identifier.classoz10400
internal.identifier.classoz10304
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.journal2245
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc327
dc.source.issuetopicViolence, Mobility and Labour Relations in Asiade
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.11588/iqas.2019.1-2.10343de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence20
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.dda.referencehttps://crossasia-journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/iqas/oai@@oai:ojs.crossasia-journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de:article/10343
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record